Author Topic: Are these specs good?  (Read 2845 times)

You'd be better off getting a newer generation card, like from the 600 or 700 series.
this
a 660 does way better for like 20 dollars more and a 700 is like 60 dollars more

Inefficient
Hot
You be the judge
I like it but I wouldnt reccomend it because of it being old, lol

RAM size and speed is low.

For lower middle class, and I mean LOWER middle class, (which is where I assume I am) this pc is God

tb hardrive, 8g ram, and dat graphics card
that would be like- my dream pc

Yes that's sad but at least that means I appreciate the little things more

RAM size and speed is low.

Speccy has a tendency to show wrong RAM speeds.

Here's a screenshot of what it says my RAM speed is:



and here's what my RAM speed actually is according to task manager:



RAM size and speed is low.
8GB is low? Most games only really use up to 3GB.
1066MHz is low, yes, but you'd only notice a difference between it and any higher clocked RAM through benchmarking. There is no real-world difference.
Speccy has a tendency to show wrong RAM speeds.
691 * 2 = 1382 ≈ 1333
It's not wrong at all.

691 * 2 = 1382 ≈ 1333
It's not wrong at all.

oh, right

i forgot speccy does that :V

RAM size and speed is low.
the size isnt low you dunk. what do you concider average, this? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1gK8m
« Last Edit: July 14, 2013, 10:28:27 PM by Nal »

the size isnt low you dunk. what do you concider average, this? http://pcpartpicker.com/p/1gK8m
No, probably I would think 16 is average.

No, probably I would think 16 is average.

8 is average for gaming, 16 would be good if you're rendering models, videos, etc...

RAM size and speed is low.

you dont need more than 8gb for an average gaming computer

No, probably I would think 16 is average.
lol this guy
you only need >8GB if you are
running multiple VMs, manageable with 8GB
rendering to memory, then to disk
opening many large images in a photo manipulator (photoshop, etc)
« Last Edit: July 14, 2013, 11:53:59 PM by KoopaScooper »

8 is average for gaming, 16 would be good if you're rendering models, videos, etc...
you dont need more than 8gb for an average gaming computer
Ah ok, sorry about that.

You'd be better off getting a newer generation card, like from the 600 or 700 series.
But that would result in a higher price and I dun like that.
EDIT: Of course if you could link me to a affordable, efficient card in that series I would definitely look into it.

But that would result in a higher price and I dun like that.
EDIT: Of course if you could link me to a affordable, efficient card in that series I would definitely look into it.

whats your price range for a card?

whats your price range for a card?
Within the range of $200