Poll

Should we?

Yes
35 (64.8%)
No
19 (35.2%)

Total Members Voted: 54

Author Topic: Should we send back the refugees?  (Read 1924 times)

i don't have a problem with heightened security for refugees from unstable regions, even if they majority of them might be innocent, it's a reasonable precaution. i wouldn't support pushing them all back out though, because that's a punishment without any charges and without any guilt, and would be a fairly substantial breach of due process. i would bet that the supreme court wouldn't allow it if it were to be challenged

I don't disagree that the motivation in the Orlando attack likely had something to do with CIA. It's just maddening how whenever a muslim commits an act of terror, the media either tries to downplay or deny that the attacker was a muslim, likely to fit a narrative.

Coulter's law is the perfect example. The longer that the media goes without releasing any information on a shooter/terrorist, the more the probability of said individual being a straight white male declines.
i think it's more so that those media outlets are being careful to not negatively shape the public's reaction to fuel anti-muslim sentiments, since they certainly have the power to do it. it's funny how that kind of thing works, selectively using their powers responsibly

I think that the intentions are sometimes good. For instance, Obama never uses the term 'radical Islam' because there's already a huge anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States. I feel that it's actually somewhat honorable that a US president doesn't try to pin all the blame for CIA on Islam when we are, in a large part, responsible for why they exist.
the problem still stands that there is certainly a correlation between violence and Islam. Islam may not in and of itself cause one to become violent and kill, but it offers a feeling of being part of a larger cause than oneself, which I believe enables potential attackers. This sentiment is not unique to Islam, but it seems very common as of late.

the problem still stands that there is certainly a correlation between violence and Islam. Islam may not in and of itself cause one to become violent and kill, but it offers a feeling of being part of a larger cause than oneself, which I believe enables potential attackers. This sentiment is not unique to Islam, but it seems very common as of late.
Literally no one disputes the fact there's a correlation and that Islam makes a convenient vehicle for violence. But they would have united under some other kind of banner if everyone in the region didn't have the same religion.

the problem still stands that there is certainly a correlation between violence and Islam. Islam may not in and of itself cause one to become violent and kill, but it offers a feeling of being part of a larger cause than oneself, which I believe enables potential attackers. This sentiment is not unique to Islam, but it seems very common as of late.
I don't really see what this has to do with what he said.