Net neutrality is at risk

[AndroFox]

should've never have voted for Annoying Orange

[Ad Bot]

[The Resonte!]

or maybe it's people like you who just call everything stupid instead of explaining why it's wrong

theres only so much explaining one can give

the badness of that mindset is that its social apathy when you're too apathetic and it gets hard to put in the effort about stopping it so it slips through as opposition fizzles out

explaining is the same thing: it takes too much effort to explain why that mindset is bad when it leaves very little reward (cause someone else will eventually ask so whats the point) so its far easier to just call it stupid

[otto-san]

the fact that the FCC chairman may be anti-net neutrality is absolutely a bad thing. best-case scenario, he decides to do nothing, but i doubt that is going to happen because of how incredibly easy it would be for him to decide to do something. and there won't be any help from the cheif executive or congress either because both of those are currently anti-net neutrality as well

[Ipquarx]

if your right nut gets kicked you lose

but that doesn't mean you should let your left nut also get kicked if your right nut gets kicked

plus doesn't the US actually have net neutrality
it's just not being strictly enforced at the moment

[Shift Kitty]

theres only so much explaining one can give

the badness of that mindset is that its social apathy when you're too apathetic and it gets hard to put in the effort about stopping it so it slips through as opposition fizzles out

explaining is the same thing: it takes too much effort to explain why that mindset is bad when it leaves very little reward (cause someone else will eventually ask so whats the point) so its far easier to just call it stupid

it's also just stupid.

plus doesn't the US actually have net neutrality
it's just not being strictly enforced at the moment

i think you might need to like... re-read on what net neutrality is.
yes, it already has it. that's a good thing. it's at risk. that's a bad thing.

[otto-san]

i think you might need to like... re-read on what net neutrality is.
yes, it already has it. that's a good thing. it's at risk. that's a bad thing.

i think he's saying the FCC isn't enforcing their rules strictly enough at the moment, and so there's effectively not really net neutrality

[Master Matthew²]

should've never have voted for Annoying Orange

Well hillary's team would have done this AND nuclear war, so ya know, I'd much rather fight this battle over that one.

[otto-san]

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/27/republicans-strike-back-fcc-member-star-wars-net-neutrality

this is the guy

[Mr.Noßody]

This is probabally why we don't put the business men in charge of all business.
I wonder who they'll side with???

[Juncoph]

This is probabally why we don't put the business men in charge of all business.
I wonder who they'll side with???

u mean a system of locks and keys doesnt work when one party holds all the keys? wowe

[Drydess]

quick download all your research

[SeventhSandwich]

This is the main thing I side with Democrats on. The Internet should be accessible for everyone.

Ayy. You guys gotta call out Annoying Orange on this, since he sure as hell won't listen to us.

[SWAT One]

Well hillary's team would have done this AND nuclear war, so ya know, I'd much rather fight this battle over that one.

We're only 4 days in with a person quoted as saying "bomb the stuff outa them" and has shown interest in reinvigorating the nuclear arsenal.  You wanna take that position so soon?


This is loving stupid.  You do this and you get internet policies like China's rolling out.

[McZealot]

or maybe it's people like you who just call everything stupid instead of explaining why it's wrong

If you really need me to explain why blatant denial of facts is a bad thing, you're already too far gone.