It's almost as if they aren't accounting for "humiliation"
You're assuming the society which buried him would consider femininity applied to a male humiliating the same way we do; rule number one in anthropology and archaeology is
not to make assumptions about distant cultures. In fact, this story is sensationalized--there is definitely room to investigate the Corded Ware culture's approach to love/gender in relation to this burial, but to call it a transgender skeleton (or gay caveman as an article I found says) is jumping to conclusions.
Tony you're just as sensational and misleading as CNN.