Author Topic: daily stormer got hacked by anonymous  (Read 4745 times)

Sure. national socialist ideology is harmful because it explicitly calls for violence against others. It motivates people to harm each other. But whatever, if that doesn't do it for you, I don't think there's much I can do to convince you to think that following and preaching an ideology with "kill people different from you" on the agenda is harmful.
Okay, but the daily stormer isn't the national socialist Ideology, they're a """news""" website that is the embodiment of everything that /pol/ is, but slightly cleaned up and it also tones down the "SUPER CONSPIRACY THEORY, RED SEPTEMBER DRAGON" asinine bullstuff
Who is "they?" What have they "done before?" Since when was the term "tribal" destroyed?
They are the feelings police who twist reality to be biased in their favour.
Cry wolf meaning they will cry tribal over forgetin' anything, did you miss 2016, and the whole "All white people are tribal" and other nonsense bullstuff involving the misuse and abuse of a once powerful word to the point that it now means nothing?
Eventually they'll find a webhost who cares more about money than integrity who'll host them.
It's not that they were silenced, but rather that to the public it appeared as though this was an attempt to silence them on ideological grounds. It's not always a matter of whats true as much as it is a matter of what the perspective is to the outsider, and the outsider will not see as much as someone who lives and breathes in this stuff, and it is the outsider who is more likely to turn, and considering it is the outsider who is common in today's society for these situations in particular, this action should not be taken lightly.

the tor project also doesn't want them

I mean I hate neo national socialist's / white nationalists / the alt right (what the forget are we referring to them collectively as?) but this is hilariously hypocritical for a service that harbours horrible stuff



perfect

They are the feelings police who twist reality to be biased in their favour.
Cry wolf meaning they will cry tribal over forgetin' anything, did you miss 2016, and the whole "All white people are tribal" and other nonsense bullstuff involving the misuse and abuse of a once powerful word to the point that it now means nothing?
Who are you even talking about? Why are you answering me in hypothetical groups? And despite what you're saying, the term tribal still holds weight. People can still be tribal. Misuse of the word did not expunge it from dictionaries everywhere. It still exists. It still is used correctly, although not always. Why do you bring this up anyway? You're trying to say that the same is going to happen to the word national socialist? There's just not a basis for that. Sorry.

It's not that they were silenced, but rather that to the public it appeared as though this was an attempt to silence them on ideological grounds. It's not always a matter of whats true as much as it is a matter of what the perspective is to the outsider, and the outsider will not see as much as someone who lives and breathes in this stuff, and it is the outsider who is more likely to turn, and considering it is the outsider who is common in today's society for these situations in particular, this action should not be taken lightly.
Who are these hypothetical outsiders who have never heard of national socialists? Who is going to see a national socialist website being shut down and say "wow, they're hiding secrets from me! i should become a national socialist!" These outsiders are more common? Who are they and why is that happening? loving substantiate.

And for god's sake stop with the loving word soup. "It's not always a matter of whats true as much as it is a matter of what the perspective is to the outsider, and the outsider will not see as much as someone who lives and breathes in this stuff, and it is the outsider who is more likely to turn, and considering it is the outsider who is common in today's society for these situations in particular, this action should not be taken lightly," as one loving sentence? This is nearly unreadable.


For the record, I'm not asking these questions out of argumentative style. I have actually no idea what you're talking about. I want concise information to work with, and telling me to blame "the feelings police" doesn't tell me anything.

What happened is they got shutdown because the political power hungry children of the left bitched hard enough for it to happen.
How long until it's less selective?
How long until Riddler is Pewdiepie?


What? No, jesus christ dude think this through for like two seconds, did you see what they said in the article?


im really disappointed that there ended up to be an argument in this thread

Because, Yes Even stufflord Pseudo-national socialists have Freedom of Speech.
Freedom of speech means the government can't censor you
It does not mean that private companies are required to host your stuff.

funny how what master matthew wants could be required under dictatorial communism