Author Topic: Deathmatches should be legal  (Read 828 times)

If you and an opponent legally consent to a fight to the death, it should be legal.

There would be lots of shows broadcasting death fights it would be interesting


wasn't there a US president that was really keen on duels?

i forget who tho

Logan VS KSI but its to the death

We already have that, it's called the lottery.

Rich people get to have entertainment by watching a poor man become lucky enough to get rich overnight from a lottery ticket which about 40% is taken away from tax.

Then they get to watch the man waste it all on poor spending choices or by conmen looking to get an easy buck from someone who doesn't know how to handle millions and then the now poor again lottery winner ends up dead in a ditch somewhere from suicidal depression after losing it all.

Or watch the man get killed because legally by contractual obligation you are suppose to display your name after winning, only very few states allow you to be anonymous and coincidentally it's much harder to win in those states.



You consent to this by the lottery's terms of service.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 11:53:40 AM by King Tøny »

We already have that, it's called the lottery.

Rich people get to have entertainment by watching a poor man become lucky enough to get rich overnight from a lottery ticket which about 40% is taken away from tax.

Then they get to watch the man waste it all on poor spending choices or by conmen looking to get an easy buck from someone who doesn't know how to handle millions and then the now poor again lottery winner ends up dead in a ditch somewhere from suicidal depression after losing it all.

Or watch the man get killed because legally by contractual obligation you are suppose to display your name after winning, only very few states allow you to be anonymous and coincidentally it's much harder to win in those states.



You consent to this by the lottery's terms of service.
woke

you couldve told me that post was made by matthew and id had believed ya but yea deathmatches with consent id watch those i mean stuff that means i get to finally see brothers see whos the fastest shot in the west...tho in the east...so   fastest shot    in the uh east

We already have that, it's called the lottery.

Rich people get to have entertainment by watching a poor man become lucky enough to get rich overnight from a lottery ticket which about 40% is taken away from tax.

Then they get to watch the man waste it all on poor spending choices or by conmen looking to get an easy buck from someone who doesn't know how to handle millions and then the now poor again lottery winner ends up dead in a ditch somewhere from suicidal depression after losing it all.

Or watch the man get killed because legally by contractual obligation you are suppose to display your name after winning, only very few states allow you to be anonymous and coincidentally it's much harder to win in those states.



You consent to this by the lottery's terms of service.
Tony is Heimskr from Skyrim. An NPC.

you couldve told me that post was made by matthew and id had believed ya but yea deathmatches with consent id watch those i mean stuff that means i get to finally see brothers see whos the fastest shot in the west...tho in the east...so   fastest shot    in the uh east
technically you're always west of something

Tony is Heimskr from Skyrim. An NPC.

False.


NPCs have a hivemind like mentality.

My opinions are all original and no one shares them.

False.


NPCs have a hivemind like mentality.

My opinions are all original and no one shares them.
If a group of NPCs are asked if they like ice cream and it's a 50/50 split then which sub-group are the real NPCs?

If a group of NPCs are asked if they like ice cream and it's a 50/50 split then which sub-group are the real NPCs?

They're both NPCs.

Free will is an illusion.

They are predetermined to give yes/no functions by random chance.

legal battles should be settled in the ring

technically you're always west of something
lol youre right

lol youre right
hes right

imagine hillary v the DOJ omg or some equally goofy case