Author Topic: Alienware M11x (Image Heavy?)  (Read 1277 times)


It r not haz uberclocked?

Who wants a heavy paperweight that can barely play CS:S?

Bump:

I've tested it out with almost all my graphically-intense games (stuff like Left 4 Dead 2, TrackMania United and Fallout 3), and it ran it all perfectly, at high (if not max) settings.

Only issue is, in Fallout 3, framerates turn horrible after a while. I think it has something to do with the game itself (being as broken and glitchy as it is), because after I start getting lower framerates, if I go to a place where before I had a higher framerate (say outside of Megaton), I still have horrible framerates.

But, so far, I'm generally impressed with this thing when it comes to gaming.

My computer can kick that thing's ass performance wise. But, what do you expect when comparing a laptop to a desktop?


that processor seems really pathetic compared to the rest of the hardware on the laptop
i mean it has twice as much ram as my computer and probably a better display adapter yet half the processing power

also we aren't in 1993, 5 images isn't image heavy.

that processor seems really pathetic compared to the rest of the hardware on the laptop
i mean it has twice as much ram as my computer and probably a better display adapter yet half the processing power

The processor actually isn't bad at all, definitely made me learn not to judge a processor by how fast it is. I haven't had any problems speed-wise with the thing.

also we aren't in 1993, 5 images isn't image heavy.

Well, each of the images is like 2048x1536 (and is being loaded as that), but the forums are scaling it down.