Pennsylvania Judge Appears To Have Ruled In Favor Of Sharia Law

[Custard]

Country sovereignty; and minimum intervention unless civil rights is involved.

Not 'medium countries' dummy; 'medium governments'.

completely different

[Ad Bot]

[Visage]

This judge better lose his job. Sure the guy is a richard and was obviously trying to anger people for a few laughs but I think the muslim is an even bigger starfish for coming to this country for a better opportunity and can't even have the much deserved respect to follow its laws. If you don't like the laws of our country gtfo and go back to living in a dirt hut and working for 5 cents an hour. Nothing gets under my skin more than immigrants who come here and get a better life and still hate America and its ideals.

[Custard]

This judge better lose his job. Sure the guy is a richard and was obviously trying to anger people for a few laughs but I think the muslim is an even bigger starfish for coming to this country for a better opportunity and can't even have the much deserved respect to follow its laws. If you don't like the laws of our country gtfo and go back to living in a dirt hut and working for 5 cents an hour. Nothing gets under my skin more than immigrants who come here and get a better life and still hate America and its ideals.

and on top of that; I hate people that are born here but are not grateful for the opportunities we have.

[SeventhSandwich]

Freedom of speech is the best thing we have.

It's not ambiguous at all, which means nobody has to decide what's right and what's wrong based on individual faith because everything is okay.

Plus it's just speech so if you get insulted, it doesn't really matter.

[Visage]

Freedom of speech is the best thing we have.

It's not ambiguous at all, which means nobody has to decide what's right and what's wrong based on individual faith because everything is okay.

Plus it's just speech so if you get insulted, it doesn't really matter.

I agree with this gay friend brother.

[CityRPG]

It's not ambiguous at all

Except for the clause where the authors of the constitution felt the need to take the "moral high road" and make note that anything dubbed obscene is not protected by the constitution.

Right now this only extends to Child research and a few other nitpicks which aren't as fun and taboo to scream in a forum post, but you get my point. It's there.

[SeventhSandwich]

Except for the clause where the authors of the constitution felt the need to take the "moral high road" and make note that anything dubbed obscene is not protected by the constitution.

Right now this only extends to Child research and a few other nitpicks which aren't as fun and taboo to scream in a forum post, but you get my point. It's there.

Close enough.