Why was Client_Grammar failed?

[Dillpickle]

With the whole correction, it would be better if it knew what you were saying in context and changed it. Like the Grammar corrector on macs for their word processing programs, it will show a green line if its grammar is incorrect. This just sees a word, and changes it.
y u mak grammer improtent

[Ad Bot]

[Crêpe]

Like I said, Badspot made e-tard filter, and I think the e-tard filter wont even allow the word "wat".

you could have modified your post

[Sheath]

It was failed because it didn't fix grammar. It functioned more like a spell checker, replacing things like "itd" with "it'd".

It couldn't detect context, or repair sentence structure. It couldn't understand the tense of sentences, it couldn't correct basic errors like than and then.

Rather than fix sentences, it had just as much change of breaking them. If you type "What is your Blockland ID" it'd turn it into "What is your Blockland i'd" because it didn't understand word usage.

It was just a stupid toy. A string replacer.

[Crêpe]

Above
well said

[Port]

I should make an auto-correct system to annoy everyone by replacing words with inappropriate ones suggest words you may have meant to type and their spellings while you type.

[YayFun]

I remember this, from a long, long time ago.

[-Jetz-]

I remember this, from a long, long time ago.

You mean last week?

[Brian Smithers]

You mean last week?

  No, 2 years.

[Sylvanor]

Why is my name in this scipt? lolwutwtf? 

[Port]

  No, 2 years.

Eh?