I actually am sort of a friend with Port, so he can help me in small cases.I want to keep using Saver. If somebody can show that Sassy 1.3 is less CPU intensive than Saver, then I might switch.
What the hell is a sassy?
I want to keep using Saver. If somebody can show that Sassy 1.3 is less CPU intensive than Saver, then I might switch.
Why is everyone hesitant of me using Saver? It even has corruption detection functionality.
export() is my saver lool
I don't even know what Saver is. Shouldn't be surprising with such a generic name though.
function AxoCity_EfficientSave(%i){ if(%i < 1) %i = 1; if(AxoCity.listOnline[%i] !$= "") { AxoCity_RPDB.saveKey(AxoCity_RPDB.listOnline[%i]); schedule($AxoCity::Pref::Saver::SaveQuotaDelay, 0, "AxoCity_EfficientSave", %i + 1); } else { echo("... Finished saving"); return; }}
Blame McTwist for calling it that. http://pastebin.com/H66gAR5CNote that RPCore is public, but McTwist wants nobody to publish a changed version of its saver. This copy of Saver is untouched.Also, I'm using a cascading psuedoquota autosaver:Code: [Select]function AxoCity_EfficientSave(%i){ if(%i < 1) %i = 1; if(AxoCity.listOnline[%i] !$= "") { AxoCity_RPDB.saveKey(AxoCity_RPDB.listOnline[%i]); schedule($AxoCity::Pref::Saver::SaveQuotaDelay, 0, "AxoCity_EfficientSave", %i + 1); } else { echo("... Finished saving"); return; }}
Lol, that's not really efficient in my opinion.