New Forum Rule?

[Eatyourham]

pin a topic listing the history of terrains and interiors, why they were removed, and why they can't come back.

then make a rule banning players who bring this up again in their own topics and are dumb about it (ie, not contributing to the discussion/topic)

You just reminded me of something. brb making a new topic.

[Ad Bot]

[Kalphiter]

ITT: people pretend to know what they're talking about

[ResonKinetic]

No banishments are required.

Just a kick in the pants.

[MrLoganator111]

Either locking the topics, or banning them for 1-3 days sounds good to me!

[Zay]

pin a topic listing the history of terrains and interiors, why they were removed, and why they can't come back.

then make a rule banning players who bring this up again in their own topics and are dumb about it (ie, not contributing to the discussion/topic)

this sounds p good

[Aphtonites]

I know that some of you guys have a massive hateboner for the people who miss terrain, but christ.
Calm down.

[Plexious]

Or you could just ignore them.

[bejacks]

Or you could just ignore them.

This would do fine.

[Kalphiter]

then make a rule banning players who bring this up again in their own topics and are dumb about it (ie, not contributing to the discussion/topic)

AKA artificially terminate discussion about T+I

[Sylvanor]

what about banning an idiot like you for posting research ingame?

and i know what im talking, about i have proof!

[MARBLE MAN]

Only lock topics that say "Bring Back Terrain"/"Why was it removed?", because the answer can be found using the search button

[Sleven]

People trying to enforce a new rule should be banned. Oh wait.. it loops nooo

[Eatyourham]

I thought about it and realised that banning players will not stop them from orgininaly posting the thread. Locking...