We spend 5 seconds talking about the conquest of the "new world," which was a genocide on a larger scale than the holocaust, and like 3 loving weeks talking about the holocaust in class.
That's because the historical significance of the abuse and exploitation of Native Americans isn't quite as relevant to modern history as World War II. Yes, it was a tragedy on an equal or far greater scale than the Holocaust, but pretty much the entire state of modern Europe was set in place by the events in WWII. Memorizing the finer intricacies of Spanish encomienda and all of the conflicts between Native tribes and the US government won't do a whole lot for your understanding of modern US history. If you want to talk about historical significance, WWII is the clear winner.
The jews are the only group you see whoring themselves out about the holocaust. The Roma don't talk about it. The Russians don't talk about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porajmos#Recognition_and_remembrancehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor#RemembranceWe spend 5 seconds talking about the conquest of the "new world," which was a genocide on a larger scale than the holocaust, and like 3 loving weeks talking about the holocaust in class. Genocide loving happens. It shouldn't but it does. I don't see why we marvel at that.
My grandmother was taken away from her family in Warsaw, Poland as a teenager and forced to work in a labor camp for years until she was liberated by Russians. Her family was sent to the Warsaw ghettos, lined up in front of a ditch, and shot like animals by national socialist soldiers. In the camps, she was only fed potatoes, which malnourished her and caused her to lose all of her teeth. Shortly before she was liberated, an Allied bomb hit the bunker where her and the other laborers were sitting in and the explosion decapitated her best friend right before her eyes.
But yeah, I guess three weeks is too much time for you to spend on one topic, especially 'Jewish propaganda', right? You edgy little stuff.