but again wanting to help someone kill themselves is a very questionable thing to say the least. if it was legal and I found out that someone I knew volunteered to do that I would be very wary of them
Is that just in this hypothetical situation where you can kill physically healthy people who consent, or do you have the same feeling regarding doctors who perform euthanasia on the terminally ill or severely physically impaired?
In my mind I would see a difference. Where the euthanasia practice is more noble in that you are helping someone who can't physically take their life.
For the former it would also depend on the means of killing. If it was a lethal injection with anaesthetics, as in euthanasia clinics then I wouldn't find a person disturbing for doing that, as they're not creating a mess or causing pain, and are presumably a trained medical professional.
But if it's just the case that with your consent someone can shoot you, suffocate you, cut your throat or break your neck, then it's wrong for someone to want to do that. That's simply pleasing someones bloodlust.
I would try human flesh, if it was donated willingly from a deceased person or amputation, and was of course safe to eat.
I wouldn't kill someone just to eat flesh or desecrate the body of an unwilling deceased person.
I would try it out of curiosity, but not with an intention to carry on eating it.
Poll