what is a service provider supposed to do in areas with old or lower-capacity infrastructure? i (and a number of other people i know) live in an area with older infrastructure that is incapable of handling peak demand in the evenings and on weekends. it only started becoming an issue a few years ago when a number of our neighbors started using netflix, and that's been the case for other people i've asked
This is exactly why you should
support NN: All businesses want to continuously increase revenue. One of the main ways to do this is by increasing your customer base. But what incentive do ISPs have to invest in expanding infrastructure to reach more people, if we're going to instead allow them to just wring more and more money out of the same infrastructure they already have?
If you
don't think ISPs have the money to invest is infrastructure, then address the numerous people making claims to the contrary:
Isn’t that why I pay an internet bill every month?
Man that would be a great retort if ISPs weren't actively wasting subsidies given to them to specifically expand infrastructure...
the government literally did that and they didn't do stuff
iirc, comcast and time warner have a profit margin of like 90%. the idea that they cannot afford to create new infrastructure is absurd
big companies using absurd amounts of bandwidth and flooring everyone else with the ISPs unable to do anything to ensure everything else is able to function in resource-limited situations
netflix and youtube alone were already well over 50% combined in 2015, can't imagine that's improved
Millions of people accessing Netflix and Youtube means that millions of people are subscribing to internet service plans, and thus paying ISPs, in order to gain this access