dkamm65- Trolling me in every thread possible.

[Ephialtes]

It wouldn't even make sense if you moved it around.

Sorry, but it is correct grammar. You can continue to argue that it isn't out of sheer ignorance but I will then be forced to concoct a way to attribute it to your closeted homoloveuality.

[Ad Bot]

[dkamm65]

Uggh I promised myself I wouldn't bother to waste my time with a serious reply.

Aurion's sentence made perfect sense. Just because you didn't comprehend it, that doesn't make it incorrect.

[Aurion]

It wouldn't even make sense if you moved it around.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/said

said
adj
(Law) (prenominal) (in contracts, pleadings, etc.) named or mentioned previously; aforesaid

[Makingblah]

Lawl.

I never knew it was spelt that way. My bad.

Judging by all the drama topics you make, you must have a vagina too - so why would you want to see another vagina? Now that you don't want to see vagina I can only assume you want to see richard (although you won't admit it) therefore making you a closeted homoloveual.

Logic fail. 
You say I have a vagina, then you say I don't want to see one; fine. I must want to see richard instead; also fine! I wont admit it? I don't have a vagina in the first place. Therefore it makes me a closeted homoloveual- Hang on, no it wouldnt! It would make me a closet hetroloveual- what's wrong with that?

[Ephialtes]

You say I have a vagina, then you say I don't want to see one; fine. I must want to see richard instead; also fine! I wont admit it? I don't have a vagina in the first place. Therefore it makes me a closeted homoloveual- Hang on, no it wouldnt! It would make me a closet hetroloveual- what's wrong with that?

Sounds like the logic of ... a closeted homoloveual!

[Makingblah]

Sorry, but it is correct grammar. You can continue to argue that it isn't out of sheer ignorance but I will then be forced to concoct a way to attribute it to your closeted homoloveuality.

I never knew said meant that as well. That's my bad! Could've said that in the first place, but out of sheer ignorance- you didn't!

This thread is like a hard english test. :(

[Makingblah]

Sounds like the logic of ... a closeted homoloveual!

So you are a closeted homoloveual? What the forget is going on in this thread? I'm really confused.

[dkamm65]

So you are a closeted homoloveual? What the forget is going on in this thread? I'm really confused.

loveually confused?

[Ephialtes]

Could've said that in the first place, but out of sheer ignorance- you didn't!

Oop, Go back to Chapter 2 and revise the meaning of "ignorance" because you're using it incorrectly. One black spot on the wall chart for you, mister.

So you are a closeted homoloveual? What the forget is going on in this thread? I'm really confused.

Ah, when I quote what you've said it means I'm replying directly to that bit of text.

[Makingblah]

Oop, Go back to Chapter 2 and revise the meaning of "ignorance" because you're using it incorrectly. One black spot on the wall chart for you, mister.

Sorry, I was using sarcasm.. rather badly. Nevermind what I just said. I'm just confused as to what's happening and what stuff means now.

Ah, when I quote what you've said it means I'm replying directly to that bit of text.

But what I said was completely valid. So anything valid= person is closet homoloveual. It don't make sense, bro.

[Makingblah]

loveually confused?

You're trolling. Why can't you get banned or something? You're a loving horrible troll and all you seem to do on the forum is cause people greif.

[dkamm65]

You're trolling. Why can't you get banned or something? You're a loving horrible troll and all you seem to do on the forum is cause people greif.

You =/= Everybody
 

[Skip]

You're trolling. Why can't you get banned or something? You're a loving horrible troll and all you seem to do on the forum is cause people greif.

It's just you.

[Makingblah]

Pathetic girl-like grudge holding award goes to dkamm.

[dkamm65]

Making a drama topic really helped your cause, didn't it?