Author Topic: Socialist Democracy: a game of "fairness"  (Read 3235 times)

Pretty fun. I had $22 worth of bricks invisible when you were going around hammering  :cookieMonster:

The guide is you just stay in the server for like, 10 mintues tops, and you can start getting money for sure.
So, you showed us CityRP?

Of the complaints and suggestions I get, here's a rough division:

5% are valid
10% are people not really understanding my metaphor

the other 85%:


Jokes on them Mr_Wallet was only pretending!

Also I fixed the economy by literally kicking people out of their homes and not doing any "derp we need to protect homeowners" pansy bullstuff, which only after-the-fact did I realize "holy stuff I just solved the sub-prime mortgage crCIA in a video game"

Chat should be changed to a local chat to reduce chat spam

currently am the proud owner of over 100$

You should make it so that people can't get elected more than 3 or 2 times in a row.

Needs moar youtube commercial for the mod :v

Some suggestions:
1.
Chat should be changed to a local chat to reduce chat spam
2.
A limit on terms, perhaps a maximum of 4 terms in a row
3.
A toggle for whether or not you are running, so people cant vote for you
4.
Change prices depending on size
2 dollars for a 1x1 is crazy
« Last Edit: July 24, 2010, 11:11:49 PM by Colten »

Tom

Bricks represent human consumption rather than current actual wealth, which cannot be accurately measured in the real modern-day world. The idea that people can consume a massive amount and still get welfare benefits (the poor who deserve it) is a central point I was trying to make with the mod.
When you think about it, your mod doesn't demonstrate it very well. Your simulation doesn't tax consumption like in real life (at least in the United States). Becasue I'm pretty sure when it comes to demonstrating welfare abuse, the abusers people are probably consuming more then food.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2010, 02:01:17 AM by Tom »

Above post sounded like this video: :cookieMonster:
Primarily because of ambiguous punctuation, but also like, what the hell are demonstration welfare abuse, and what are they consuming more of before they consume... food... wait what.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2010, 01:48:58 AM by Mr. Wallet »

Tom

I blame spell check. I'll edit it. What I'm basically saying is that your simulation doesn't demonstrate "welfare abuse" very well because it doesn't include sales tax.

Builders will accidentally the economy :(
I accidentally the whole reccession :u.