Author Topic: Girl Throws Puppies into a River (Explicit Warning)  (Read 33598 times)

Atleast they weren't put in a bin for 17 hours. :c

Seriously though,  I agree with bisjac saying that it's best that they die when they're of no use and can't be looked after, but even so, a living creature deserves some respect. Not being thrown into a river to be crushed and drowned.
Something more humane, perhaps. I'd much rather that someone killed an animal that couldn't be released or looked after, by some means of, say, death by chemical means. Being put to sleep or something similar.

This. Imagine yourself a 25 year old single mom of two kids or just plain lost her job (just saying) and someone leaves six puppies on your doorstep. You'd rather they die slowly from lack of hunger or this way. It's either this or she cuts off their heads or something. "Putting down" dogs cost money as well.

Does she have to enjoy it though?

Because they have no way of looking after them, and don't fancy going to the lengths of keeping a litter of ever-growing puppies that eat loads and stuff everywhere. It's likely the culture there, but the poor sensitive children and people who rub their richard against cats and dogs every day in western countries cry big boo hoo tears whenever they see an animal treated badly, despite the fact that thousands are killed, abused and otherwise manhandled right beneath their noses.

Seriously, cry some more.

Also, she has a damn good throw, she's 25 by the way but still.

I sure hope you go to hell, and cry, and be brutally tortured while there :D

Puppies aren't meant to be killed, they have a purpose. I'm shamed to live on the same planet with you fools.

Atleast they weren't put in a bin for 17 hours. :c

Seriously though,  I agree with bisjac saying that it's best that they die when they're of no use and can't be looked after, but even so, a living creature deserves some respect. Not being thrown into a river to be crushed and drowned.
Something more humane, perhaps. I'd much rather that someone killed an animal that couldn't be released or looked after, by some means of, say, death by chemical means. Being put to sleep or something similar.

« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 04:44:08 PM by Mechaspark11 »


This. Imagine yourself a 25 year old single mom of two kids or just plain lost her job (just saying) and someone leaves six puppies on your doorstep. You'd rather they die slowly from lack of hunger or this way. It's either this or she cuts off their heads or something. "Putting down" dogs cost money as well.
.22LR costs $5-25 a brick of 50 rounds, that's about 10-50 cents an animal.

I sure hope you go to hell, and cry, and be brutally tortured while there :D
Hell is for stupid people who cry enormous bloo bloo tears over puppies being chucked in a river. I'd much prefer to have them put down on the spot, but sadly every advanced nation is in a massive race to become the best nanny state, and rifles just aren't available in some places.

.22LR costs $5-25 a brick of 50 rounds, that's about 10-50 cents an animal.
Hell is for stupid people who cry enormous bloo bloo tears over puppies being chucked in a river. I'd much prefer to have them put down on the spot, but sadly every advanced nation is in a massive race to become the best nanny state, and rifles just aren't available in some places.

Don't worry friend, you'll see what mistake you have made when you burn in hell.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 04:48:29 PM by Mechaspark11 »

.22LR costs $5-25 a brick of 50 rounds, that's about 10-50 cents an animal.
I don't know about you, but I like $200 dollar cartridges at 10,000 rounds per minute.


Don't worry friend, you'll see what mistake you have made when you burn in hell.
Hell is a superstition invented to keep people in line in the dark ages, when the churches were major powers and large currency sinks. I'm not scared of the silly soothsayings of the past.

I don't know about you, but I like $200 dollar cartridges at 10,000 rounds per minute.
WHO TOUCHED SASHA.

In old Russia one of the punishments was that you get 50% of your skin torn off, then you gets burnt alive. If you still live you are thrown into an ice river to drown.
HURRY!  VIGILANTE JUSTICE!

Hell is a superstition invented to keep people in line in the dark ages, when the churches were major powers and large currency sinks. I'm not scared of the silly soothsayings of the past.

I feel bad for you.


When you are crying, I'll be laughing Deathwish. :D

Puppies aren't meant to be killed, they have a purpose. I'm shamed to live on the same planet with you fools.

And what purpose is that, they are domestic animals that are there for the pleaure of a companion, and I'm guessing that they probably weren't going to be some drug sniffing dogs.

.22LR costs $5-25 a brick of 50 rounds, that's about 10-50 cents an animal.
I'm talking about the more "humane" way with the needles and stuff.

Let me ask you then.
Would you rather an animal, that can't defend itself, is humanely put down without any pain or suffering, or would you rather an animal is left to wander around in the wild, which it's not adapted to, will get hurt, can't defend itself against other predatory animals and insects, isn't likely to survive long and won't be able to get the food that it commonly eats.

Dogs eat meat. Domesticated dogs eat meat that is gathered for them by humans. Yes, some hunt rabbits/foxes, but they're not likely to live on this alone and be able to hunt to sustain themselves.
If a dog is put into the wild it wouldn't survive.

Similarly, it's not going to live a very good life if it's left in an urban area.
There's absolutely no wild food there for a dog. It wouldn't be able to hunt. It's going to have to scavenge for scraps of food. Bits of crap left by people, which is going to be far from healthy for a dog.
A dog or most any other domesticated animal left in the cities and towns, would be at the mercy of the local populace. There's a high chance in western countries that it would encounter other people like the one in the video. People who would hurt an animal just for the sake of it, just to have fun.

Would you rather they have slim chances of survival and most likely a very bad life, or humanely put down?

Also, Hell will freeze over before I burn there.

I feel bad for you.
When you are crying, I'll be laughing. :D
Hell was made up to scare people into being good. It might exist, it may not. It is just something thought up by a human mind. Maybe that human mind was guided by God. Maybe there is no God. This is getting religious...

And what purpose is that, they are domestic animals that are there for the pleaure of a companion, and I'm guessing that they probably weren't going to be some drug sniffing dogs.
I'm talking about the more "humane" way with the needles and stuff.

What are you needed for?

Also, dogs are meant to keep the planet alive and well. Dogs actually help nature, assuming you have no clue that they do.

And dogs are actually supposed to be left alone, and not slowly killed by us.
Dogs should have no part in our murderous behavior.
Sickos like you people, think otherwise.
I wonder what you do when you see a puppy, do you attempt to kill it? I now see how the world is unstable, due because of behavior such as this.

Just let the dogs have their own backs. Don't just go and kill them.

I'm done wasting my time on this thread though.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 04:59:54 PM by Mechaspark11 »