Author Topic: Whats up with 5 year old blockheads having a no swearing rule?  (Read 5571 times)

While the OP is obviously an idiot, people with these rules are also stupid.

Heres my view. I only care about the meaning of words, not the words themselves.

Like what? Is there mommys and daddys watching everything they do on the computer, or is it just its just too much for those lifeless bastards? See! I'm swearing now! What are you 5 year olds gonna do about this now!?!?! Ban us swearing people, just know you banning 5 year olds will never be like normal people.
You're making yourself sound like an idiot, event though I know you are one.
Kids don't cuss because they think it's bad, and if you have a problem with it, too bad for you, deal with it.

Annoying OP is an annoying kid.

Any mature person can control their swearing, I personally do not swear much anyway, It only makes me mad when I do, and then get a warning from an admin about an unposted rule.

You're making yourself sound like an idiot, event though I know you are one.
Kids don't cuss because they think it's bad, and if you have a problem with it, too bad for you, deal with it.

The problem is that other people know it's "bad". Because you're too stubborn to realize this, you think it doesn't mean anything.

Others shouldn't deal with something you do because of your stupidity.

So this is about you complaining that you can't repetitively swear in certain servers? Just get out of the server if you don't like it, nobody's stopping you

So this is about you complaining that you can't repetitively swear in certain servers? Just get out of the server if you don't like it, nobody's stopping you
Not liking a server's policies != not liking the server.
Why's this so largely misconstrued?

The problem is that other people know it's "bad". Because you're too stubborn to realize this, you think it doesn't mean anything.

Others shouldn't deal with something you do because of your stupidity.
Are you implying that all individuals must abide by popular standard?  That's some pretty twisted logic, sir.

The problem is that other people know it's "bad". Because you're too stubborn to realize this, you think it doesn't mean anything.

Others shouldn't deal with something you do because of your stupidity.

Are you trying to argue that curse words being bad is a fact? I hope not because that would make you one of those super handicaps. Please tell me I misunderstood.

The problem is that other people know it's "bad". Because you're too stubborn to realize this, you think it doesn't mean anything.

Others shouldn't deal with something you do because of your stupidity.
Since when did I say that I thought it didn't mean anything?
I know it's bad, but I was simply stating that kids think it's bad.
It is.
Read what I wrote before you post, moron.


Are you implying that all individuals must abide by popular standard?  That's some pretty twisted logic, sir.
Understanding from that perspective would make it seem that way.

We all base our ideas of what people say on what we've understood the meaning of their words to be. They could have a completely different meaning of what the listener interpreted. That difference of our understanding of meaning is involuntary and shouldn't be attacked.
Someone might find a word to be negative, while someone else might find that word to be "just a word". Should the person who is offended by what they hear put aside their feelings because the other person believes that what they're saying isn't negative? You could say that they need to just suck it up and learn to accept the new. But, because the first person's understanding is involuntary, that wouldn't be so easy. It would be much easier if the second person push aside their beliefs because they don't have as much of a strong of a feeling as the first person towards what's said.

Excuse me if what I'm blabbering about makes no sense. You could disagree with me. But, what I've said to Calender can't be undone and if he has
a problem with it, too bad for you, deal with it.

Since when did I say that I thought it didn't mean anything?
I know it's bad, but I was simply stating that kids think it's bad.
It is.
Read what I wrote before you post, moron.
I now see what you mean.

I misinterpreted it like this
"Kids don't cuss because it's bad, they cuss because they don't think its bad."
Does that make sense?

Order syntax is a bitch. Especially on a forum.

I still cannot tell for the life of me if you are against cursing, for cursing, or pulling a philosoraptor.

I still cannot tell for the life of me if you are against cursing, for cursing, or pulling a philosoraptor.
I could explain in a way for you to understand fully what I mean, but that would take up another wall text, which I doubt anyone wants (including me).

Generally: I'm against the way some use it.

Understanding from that perspective would make it seem that way.

We all base our ideas of what people say on what we've understood the meaning of their words to be. They could have a completely different meaning of what the listener interpreted. That difference of our understanding of meaning is involuntary and shouldn't be attacked.
Someone might find a word to be negative, while someone else might find that word to be "just a word". Should the person who is offended by what they hear put aside their feelings because the other person believes that what they're saying isn't negative? You could say that they need to just suck it up and learn to accept the new. But, because the first person's understanding is involuntary, that wouldn't be so easy. It would be much easier if the second person push aside their beliefs because they don't have as much of a strong of a feeling as the first person towards what's said.

Excuse me if what I'm blabbering about makes no sense. You could disagree with me. But, what I've said to Calender can't be undone and if he has
To try and justify the notion that something may be involuntarily promoted, and, thus, shouldn't be disturbed, is absolutely outrageous.  Not only are you accepting bias, but you're also dividing opinion from fact.  The fact: the word does not harm the person.  In many cases, the person convinces themself that it's offending to the extent of creating a standard within their head.  This can lead to several emotional aspects, such as depression, but it's still ultimately due to the person's interpretation of the word (unless you consider it to harm the body physically, such as in sight and sound). 

I understand that there are several attacks made to purposely harm people mentally, which are ultimately referred to as insult.  However, several terms, many of which I'm currently using, can promote this same establishment.  The words that fall into the catagory of being a "swear word" can be used for many things that aren't insult, such as emphasis, common referral, etc.

Regardless of the obvious points, every single word produced could be considered offensive.  Does this imply that we should quit using the english language as a whole because it may lead to emotional disruption?  Or, even, put ourselves in solitude due to paranoia of every inflicting event that occurs within the world?  I don't think so, but you may have a differentiating opinion.