Author Topic: Drawings Megathread  (Read 4517980 times)

You're 110% furry, your opinion is sort of moot on whether or not weird little hamster things doing the do is weird.
They're being labled/named as characters.
The hair and facial details are pretty much all exactly the same, with the only real differences being for stylized eyes.

See the problem here with everyone thinking PowerDag's research is chubby bunny loving is that it is NOT his only style. He has other styles in his art that aren't chibi-esque that would make sense to be research.

Are they exclusive for richard drawing then or what? Because I see no such thing.

Are they exclusive for richard drawing then or what? Because I see no such thing.

Just because it isn't posted here doesn't mean it doesn't exist. He has a lot of other art past this thread that aren't NSFW that are a different style.

Yes, I read your post, but where are they?



my vajop
keepin them nice and warm until the day they finally hatch

Places.
You can't exactly try to make a definitive point and then expect to be credible while refusing to provide any actual proof.

well DAMN its not like he can post it here

The reason for that being?

RULE 2 YOU DONK
wait we mean the nsfw art right


oh oop
i'd try to find one actually but i wanna go to bed. bye

You can't exactly try to make a definitive point and then expect to be credible while refusing to provide any actual proof.

I don't see the necessity of having iron proof that people can have different styles. Is that an alien concept? Why does such a novel thing require proof? Is it not common for people to have multiple styles?

I don't see the necessity of having iron proof that people can have different styles. Is that an alien concept? Why does such a novel thing require proof? Is it not common for people to have multiple styles?
You're trying to argue a point and then outright refusing to back it up. Yes, shockingly enough, that hurts your credibility and the validity of your point.