You shouldn't be allowed to use the word "explain". Saying a bunch of names is not explaining. since saying a bunch of names is not explaining, and the post seemed completely random and unrelated since I had no idea you were talking about your image, I didn't finish reading it. boo loving hoo.
if you were going to actually explain it, you would say something like "he was talking about my image in which his character is present" or some such. which is much clearer and easier to understand, hence a proper use of the word "explain". a random person suddenly going "from left to right blah blah blah" doesn't make a lick of sense and seems highly unrelated.
Giving a half-assed try at associating certain information with a post that hasn't even been connected to the conversation isn't proper explanation.
also, the word I was looking for was apparently "gabble" not "rabble"
My logic was, person posts about contents of something, same person who had posted a drawing shortly before containing four people, drawing contains four people as well, etc. etc.
Not to mention I replied to you, and you were saying that face was saying that he was the best, as Koch had stated when Face said he towered above everyone as usual. Now, understandably, this logic is difficult to follow, but by saying "I should have explained the contents of that image" I was linking my post to the drawing. By wrapping up with "So therefore he would be the tall guy" in the page with no other drawings of comparatively tall people, I assumed this would be enough. I admit, I was vague, and am at fault. I also have really stuffty explanation skills.
Also "gabble" is a word?
