Author Topic: A endless question  (Read 4566 times)

I hate mindbending questions, like that one someone asked here; what if we had land that was flat and went on in every direction forever?
Minecraft.

C:

depends how you think of it

if you think time goes forever, imagine a graph and plot a line anywhere on it
in theory, it goes on forever, but you only see a portion of it

or

if you think time repeats itself
draw a circle
nono, what does it REALLY LOOK like
LITERALLY

hey guys what does time look like

 I think of it as a waterwheel.

 
nono, what does it REALLY LOOK like
LITERALLY

 Can you imagine motion? Energy, explosion. Nope
« Last Edit: January 18, 2011, 11:52:11 AM by Riot »

someone does not loving know what im asking for

someone does not loving know what im asking for

 Forgot time isn't energy.


 Edit: Give me a picture, or describe what the outside of the Universe looks like in today's theory. Not fancy explanations of other universes please.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2011, 11:51:53 AM by Riot »

that was my point all along
it is impossible to make a true picture of time
time is abstract

 I completely forgot the dimensional theory(Is it much of a theory now?). Time is the fourth dimension, just image everything that ever happened in the past and future crammed into one image.

 Edit: Unlike paint, light when combined into one spot it forms the color white. Over the billions of years and enough light has been collected in the image from the past and future, you should have a blank white image.

 However I can give you a metaphorical image of engines, or a river.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2011, 11:57:25 AM by Riot »

I was asking this entire time for an image that you'd imagine to be an actual 'picture' of time, not a representation of it.

What you're doing is trying to visualize something that'd never appear in that medium.
Love is not something you can draw and be sure that's exactly what it looks like. It has no shape or form.

Now I realize how pointless this all was.

I was asking this entire time for an image that you'd imagine to be an actual 'picture' of time, not a representation of it.

What you're doing is trying to visualize something that'd never appear in that medium.
Love is not something you can draw and be sure that's exactly what it looks like. It has no shape or form.

Now I realize how pointless this all was.

 I can draw the chemical that creates the feeling and sensation of love.

But that's not love, that's the chemical that creates the feeling of love.
Subject = chemical, not love itself.

I was asking this entire time for an image that you'd imagine to be an actual 'picture' of time, not a representation of it.

What you're doing is trying to visualize something that'd never appear in that medium.
Love is not something you can draw and be sure that's exactly what it looks like. It has no shape or form.

Now I realize how pointless this all was.
Of course you can draw love, ♥.

And that's a goddamn symbol. A loving. Symbol. Is it that hard to understand, or are you just loving with me?

 Love isn't real, it's a chemical. Love doesn't exist, that's what average people believe in. There is no soul energy attraction going on between your mother and father.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2011, 12:04:50 PM by Riot »

Love is a sensation. It's something that exists in the mind. Abstract.

There is no soul energy attraction going on between your mother and father.

 Hippies.