Off Topic > Games
Graphics or Gameplay?
ChexGuy331:
--- Quote from: yuki on March 03, 2011, 04:33:04 PM ---Chrono, I honestly didn't expect such a stupid comment from you.
--- End quote ---
It's from Pure Pwnage, but the original comment was about storylines and not graphics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7VAhzPcZ-s
Tom:
Gameplay is usually worthless without believable graphics. Graphics are what allow you to me more immersed in the gameplay. The more believable the graphics are, the more you will forget about reality and be absorbed in the game.
Minecrafts gameplay is great, but I honestly don't have a whole lot of fun with it because after awhile the graphics literally hurt my eyes.
oromis:
Cortex Command trades in dynamic lighting for having every pixel be a piece of a destructible environment that reacts to bullets (which also turn into the environment when they stop moving) and rockets.
Minecraft sacrifices fancy 3d models for having every block in the world that can be as big as 8x the surface of Earth be a block that can be destroyed, taken, replaced, or crafted.
As long as I can recognize an enemy when I see one, the graphics are fine. Anything that is made with ~80% quality allocated to graphics and ~20% to gameplay is pretty much a tech demo.
Hiiro3293:
I clicked Graphics to troll. hahah
IkeTheGeneric:
--- Quote from: Hiiro3293 on March 03, 2011, 07:41:16 PM ---I clicked Graphics to troll. hahah
--- End quote ---
Admittance to trolling?
ONE OF THE UNWRITTEN RULES...
BROKEN...