Off Topic > Games
Project Blackout - An alternative to CS Source
Azzurolix:
--- Quote from: ChexGuy331 on March 08, 2011, 10:04:42 PM ---Implies there's a massive amount of people at 1 given time in a single server, not broken off into different "rooms" with a lobby system.
gg, you're an idiot.
--- End quote ---
So 32 is not massive? And I'm not even sure that's the highest playercount I saw.
Qwepir:
--- Quote from: Azzurolix on March 08, 2011, 10:03:41 PM ---MMO. Massive Multiplayer Online.
--- End quote ---
Only an MMO is hundreds or thousands of people on a single server. Not a game with an online function that happens to have a bunch of people that play it.
--- Quote from: Azzurolix on March 08, 2011, 10:05:42 PM ---So 32 is not massive?
--- End quote ---
NO 32 IS NOT MASSIVE.
Battlefield 2 came out in 2005 and it could have 64 players on a single and it wasn't stupid enough to call itself an MMO. Hell I think even 1942 had 64 player capabilities and that came out in what, 02?
SkullCandy:
This is worse than Combat Arms.
ChexGuy331:
--- Quote from: Azzurolix on March 08, 2011, 10:05:42 PM ---So 32 is not massive?
--- End quote ---
no stuff it's not forgetin' massive, a stuffton of servers for CS or TF2 these days have 64 players, and it was a forgetin' FEATURE for Battlefield.
Massive implies hundreds, if not thousands of people on one server.
Holy stuff.
Azzurolix:
--- Quote from: ChexGuy331 on March 08, 2011, 10:06:53 PM ---no stuff it's not forgetin' massive, a stuffton of servers for CS or TF2 these days have 64 players, and it was a forgetin' FEATURE for Battlefield.
Massive implies hundreds, if not thousands of people on one server.
Holy stuff.
--- End quote ---
Whatever floats your boat. If 32 players are stuck on a map that wouldn't be 1 kilometer wide IRL, it's still overcrowded. Not to mention that MMORPG's have lobbies and servers too. And think about how many of those players you're FORCED to interact with.