Mathematical Question || Is a Circle a Polygon?

[Sandvich]

A circle is a circle

[Ad Bot]

[Night Fox]

A circle is a circle

yes

[aml]

Yes, a circle has a large number of sides.
These sides are incredibly small, so small infact that the sides appear as one curved side.

[Gamefandan]

x = 0.999...

>Define variable

10x = 9.999...
10x-x = 9

>Subtract one x.

9x = 9

>Divide both sides by 9.

x = 1

>まほ～

10x-x = 0

[Vagabond]

A circle has 360 sides, each so small that they can't be seen. It is a polygon.

[Teneksi]

10x-x = 0

10x / x = 0

10x - 1x = 9x

A circle has 360 sides, each so small that they can't be seen. It is a polygon.

Degrees =/= sides

[SpreadsPlague]

10x-x = 0

wat

10x - x = 9x

A circle has 360 sides, each so small that they can't be seen. It is a polygon.

no, that would be a 360-sided polygon

silly aeris go back to taking nudes


ninja: damnit eksi

[Sandvich]

Yes, a circle has a large number of sides.
These sides are incredibly small, so small infact that the sides appear as one curved side.

You can fold a circle symetrically infinite times so wouldnt that be like infinite sides

A circle has 360 sides, each so small that they can't be seen. It is a polygon.

I though it was just 360 degrees >:(

[SpreadsPlague]

I though it was just 360 degrees >:(

correct

[Gamefandan]

forget, for some reason I was thinking like 10(x-x) You can see how I could make that mistake.

[aml]

You can fold a circle symetrically infinite times so wouldnt that be like infinite sides

You can fold a square infinite times, and it only has four sides.

Edit: Read it wrong.

[Night Fox]

A circle has 360 sides, each so small that they can't be seen. It is a polygon.

hey Ae

silly aeris go back to taking nudes

it's killing time

[SpreadsPlague]

You can fold a square infinite times, and it only has four sides.

You can fold a circle symetrically infinite times so wouldnt that be like infinite sides

[Sandvich]

correct

Yay common sense :D

You can fold a square infinite times, and it only has four sides.

no >:C
thats just dividing it into 1/4's

[Teneksi]

forget, for some reason I was thinking like 10(x-x) You can see how I could make that mistake.

Yes, I actually thought that was correct for a moment myself

You can fold a square infinite times, and it only has four sides.

wasn't he supporting your argument to begin with?