Author Topic: Props to BLB?  (Read 3163 times)

Just try not to write posts and make claims about things you don't at all understand in the future, that's all I'm asking here. You going on the defensive is a very messy affair.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2011, 08:08:50 AM by Ephialtes »

Just try not to write posts and make claims about things you don't at all understand in the future, that's all I'm asking here. You going on the defensive is a very messy affair.

Granted, I'm not entirely knowledgeable on the subject of BLB, but what I do know is that its not some mainstream model that is easily and accessibly edited by any modeling program. Thats all I'm saying. By definition, sure its a model, I was wrong there. And perhaps its possible Zack0Wack0 can make extensions for modeling programs to export to the format, if so please do.

mainstream model
Mainstream implies a certain amount of usage.
Usage is unrelated to the actual data the file contains.

Mainstream implies a certain amount of usage.
Usage is unrelated to the actual data the file contains.

No, mainstream has numerous definitions. My context was referring to the model not being common, or accepted in the industry because its purpose made for a single program.

The next person that forces me to reference semantics is going to be shot.