| Blockland Forums > General Discussion |
| Syerjchep --- img2brick soon --- quick rate --- tracking --- more stuff! |
| << < (25/64) > >> |
| Ephialtes:
I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top. |
| Ipquarx:
--- Quote from: DrenDran on April 22, 2011, 12:00:53 PM --- * 1. A brick add-on maker, which can make bricks, even print bricks or bricks that are water. You just go to the website, choose the settings of the brick you want, and submit, and the server generates the download for you right there. * 2. Cross server chat, though a secondary server I will host, that allows cross server chat, though an add-on, without port forwarding. --- End quote --- 1. already made, and several times at that, and like others, only allows you to make one brick at a time. 2. unless your a programming god like Ephi, not possible. plus, xserver is nearly the exact same thing, and its more convinent. not all that impressed. |
| DrenDran:
--- Quote from: Ephialtes on April 29, 2011, 08:22:10 PM ---I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top. --- End quote --- Actually I was thinking of removing that message. You see, I'm actually in the process of redesigning the website with CSS as I type this. --- Quote from: Ipquarx on April 29, 2011, 08:24:17 PM ---1. already made, and several times at that, and like others, only allows you to make one brick at a time. 2. unless your a programming god like Ephi, not possible. plus, xserver is nearly the exact same thing, and its more convinent. not all that impressed. --- End quote --- 1. All the implications have been made as .exe files, which are not allowed to be posted here. 2. I've made things like it before, it would be easy, and as convient as the other add-on, except port forwarding is not required. |
| DontCare4Free:
--- Quote from: cucumberdude on April 29, 2011, 08:15:04 PM ---Well hurr. But tons of people download firebug. Anyways, if someone is tech savvy enough to write CSS code, I'm sure downloading firebug wouldn't be all that difficult... --- End quote --- That wasn't related. You claimed that many modern browsers has this feature built-in. Also, firebug is only available in the full version for Firefox. And it would be reset upon page reload. A greasemonkey userscript would be needed for this. --- Quote from: cucumberdude on April 29, 2011, 08:15:04 PM ---Allowing other people to see user-defined customization would be idiotic. For example, I could set my some element of my profile to display the lemonparty picture. --- End quote --- Idiotic? The CSS code can only decide how a page looks, not how it works. Allowing this form of customization would be an easy way to give people the ability to give their profile a personal touch without any real security issues. And for the image, so what? But if you really want strict moderation you two could come up with some moderation system. Or an option to disable other people's page's custom themes (completely or just that person). --- Quote from: Ephialtes on April 29, 2011, 08:22:10 PM ---I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top. --- End quote --- I have to agree about this. |
| cucumberdude:
--- Quote from: Ephialtes on April 29, 2011, 08:22:10 PM ---I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top. --- End quote --- Or perhaps he just wanted to do it for the fun of it? It wouldn't be the first time someone has made something 'for the hell of it'. --- Quote from: DontCare4Free on April 29, 2011, 08:27:40 PM ---Idiotic? The CSS code can only decide how a page looks, not how it works. Allowing this form of customization would be an easy way to give people the ability to give their profile a personal touch without any real security issues. And for the image, so what? But if you really want strict moderation you two could come up with some moderation system. Or an option to disable other people's page's custom themes (completely or just that person). --- End quote --- Or eliminate the problem all together and offer certain pre-made themes/color schemes for profiles. I suppose once again it's a matter of judgment. Is it worth sacrificing some freedom to gain some safety, content-wise? I don't want to see gay research when I click on some dude's profile, but I also don't want to be completely unable to customize my own. Ah well. I guess I dunno where I stand on this. Also, it's worth noting that CSS can really forget with sites - for example, you can edit height and width attributes on images for example which would rape the layout. EDIT: Another thing. Chat should go from oldest to newest. That's just customary. If you want, create an anchor at the bottom and link the user there when he opens the comments section, but don't have it go in reverse chronological order, that's insane. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |