| Blockland Forums > General Discussion |
| Syerjchep --- img2brick soon --- quick rate --- tracking --- more stuff! |
| << < (5/64) > >> |
| DontCare4Free:
--- Quote from: DrenDran on April 22, 2011, 05:58:45 PM ---If you can't get a response, it either crashed, or is being updated. --- End quote --- Now that I it seems to work again, I see that you do nothing to simplify caching. In response to this: --- Code: ---Accept:application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 Accept-Charset:ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.8,sv;q=0.6 Connection:keep-alive Host:syerjchep.org Referer:http://syerjchep.org/requestlog.html User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.205 Safari/534.16 --- End code --- You send me this: --- Code: ---Connection:close Content-Length:287 Content-Type:text/html; charset=UTF-8 --- End code --- Some whitespace got cut off when copy-pasting. Still though, you don't send anything related to caching, and you don't compress the output. That, for example, is why you should let someone else do the heavy http lifting for you, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel. |
| Brian_Smith3:
I was making thw wheel! No fair. Idea steeler. |
| Demian:
--- Quote from: DrenDran on April 22, 2011, 05:58:45 PM ---It's been the name of my/our group/clan for many months here on Blockland, and elsewhere for even longer. --- End quote --- I see. Looks like keyboard mash to me. |
| DrenDran:
--- Quote from: DontCare4Free on April 22, 2011, 06:12:28 PM ---Now that I it seems to work again, I see that you do nothing to simplify caching. In response to this: --- Code: ---Accept:application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 Accept-Charset:ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.8,sv;q=0.6 Connection:keep-alive Host:syerjchep.org Referer:http://syerjchep.org/requestlog.html User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.205 Safari/534.16 --- End code --- You send me this: --- Code: ---Connection:close Content-Length:287 Content-Type:text/html; charset=UTF-8 --- End code --- Some whitespace got cut off when copy-pasting. Still though, you don't send anything related to caching, and you don't compress the output. That, for example, is why you should let someone else do the heavy http lifting for you, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel. --- End quote --- I know all about that, compression is going to be further in the future simply because the files being transferred at this point are incredibly small, and mostly text, so the compression ratio will be awefully low, and it would take a decent amount of work to do for such a little payoff. As for cacheing, the pages at this point are quite volatile, and once again, small, so while I may implement it sooner, as in tomarrow, it is still not a high priority. --- Quote from: Demian on April 22, 2011, 06:28:36 PM ---I see. Looks like keyboard mash to me. --- End quote --- Good for you. |
| DontCare4Free:
--- Quote from: DrenDran on April 22, 2011, 06:29:28 PM ---I know all about that, compression is going to be further in the future simply because the files being transferred at this point are incredibly small, and mostly text, so the compression ratio will be awefully low, and it would take a decent amount of work to do for such a little payoff. As for cacheing, the pages at this point are quite volatile, and once again, small, so while I may implement it sooner, as in tomarrow, it is still not a high priority. --- End quote --- But once again, using a finished and widely used web server would do most of this for you, and it would probably both be more secure and less effort on your part too to integrate it than to reinvent the wheel. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |