Bisjac is destroying the forum? :(

Off Topic > Drama

<< < (40/51) > >>

Iban:
holy stuff typing "/me" automagically turns your text into an emote.

Ronin:
your $3 words are tasty

Thorax:

--- Quote from: Nickelob Ultra on May 31, 2011, 10:30:46 PM ---That's all assuming that how we act on the internet is exactly how like we act in real life.

--- End quote ---

I know I am more serious on the internet than I am in real life, but I don't change the basics of how I interact with people.

--- Quote from: Nethog on May 31, 2011, 10:30:53 PM ---inb4ban for too cool for the internet

--- End quote ---

When did that become a ban?

--- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on May 31, 2011, 10:30:13 PM ---hey i've dated a blind chick

do i win

--- End quote ---

Yes you do.

--- Quote from: Iban on May 31, 2011, 10:33:40 PM ---holy stuff typing "/me" automagically turns your text into an emote.

--- End quote ---

Old news is old lol.

Nickelob Ultra:

--- Quote from: Thorax on May 31, 2011, 10:36:23 PM ---When did that become a ban?

--- End quote ---
A long while ago. It's an unwritten rule.

It'll probably be a week if you haven't been banned for anything else major or it's your first time being banned for that offense. Otherwise, if you did get banned for something else or other, expect worse. See you soon, I guess.

rkynick:

--- Quote from: Stocking on May 31, 2011, 10:31:32 PM ---Your petty argument is that both my rebuttal to Iban calling Nickel "creepy" is that it was a joke, and that my counter-claim that Iban has proved himself to be far creepier than could even be argued for Nick are both invalid for whatever reason. You didn't explain why I was wrong, you came in here and flat-out said my arguments were invalid and you're trying to perpetuate some kind of guise that you're some kind of debate-referee; that's no fun.

I also find it kind of funny that Iban would have the gall to call someone else "creepy and socially inept".

You want me to justify my actions? Do you even know what you're saying?

--- End quote ---

I explained why it was invalid;
--- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:04:01 PM ---The creep has the right to call someone creepy.
If you are that disturbed by it, I can reiterate what he said, and, try as you will to prove otherwise, I am not creepy.

--- End quote ---
The example is meant to prove the point, you can't base the legitimacy of what someone says on what kind of person they are, and if that was your sole argument against the legitimacy of what he said, someone else with more legitimacy could easily repeat it verbatim and render your argument irrelevant.

When you claimed that all arguments here were pointless stuffstorms, that was what I meant when I said I explained how you were wrong, because my explanation of that was much more in the open than my explanation of how your initial argument was wrong.

In any case, I flat out said your arguments were invalid because they were, and still are. To say I haven't explained this is to be spectacularly horrible at connecting the dots. You can't say his opinion on whether or not someone is a creep is invalid because he himself is a creep. You can't dismiss my argument because 'the entire forum is about discrediting users'. The only legitimate argument you've presented has been based on a severe exaggeration of my accusation, and I didn't (or now don't) think you understood(stand) me, or what my concept of a 'valid point' is. I have tried to convey the message that my idea of a valid point is one that does not have any logical fallacies within it, but that was right before you started ignoring me.

In any case,

Justify - to show to be just or right (Webster's New World Dictionary)

I want to explain why your argument is right. So, yes, I know what I'm saying.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version