| Off Topic > Drama |
| Bisjac is destroying the forum? :( |
| << < (41/51) > >> |
| Stocking:
--- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:42:48 PM ----snip- --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Stocking on May 31, 2011, 09:34:06 PM ---It's not egotistical at all, I'm talking about the fact that he's criticizing Nickel for "creeping out" Miika (even though for all we know she could've shared the log with Iban because she thought it was funny) when Iban himself pretty much takes the cake when it comes to weirding-out underage girls. --- End quote --- In case you weren't paying attention (and in which case you're a bad drama referee), I pretty explicitly challenged the validity of Iban's claim, seeing as how there's no proof either way and that Iban's accusations are complete hearsay. |
| rkynick:
--- Quote from: Stocking on May 31, 2011, 10:47:04 PM ---In case you weren't paying attention (and in which case you're a bad drama referee), I pretty explicitly challenged the validity of Iban's claim, seeing as how there's no proof either way and that Iban's accusations are complete hearsay. --- End quote --- That was never and still is not what I am bothering you about. I am bothering you about saying his argument lacks legitimacy because he is a creep. (you have noticed I don't care about which one of you is right or wrong, as you keep claiming I'm a 'drama referee') Additionally, it is interesting that you can call all arguments petty and then claim that you've made non-petty arguments. Which is it? |
| Stocking:
--- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:50:15 PM ---That was never and still is not what I am bothering you about. I am bothering you about saying his argument lacks legitimacy because he is a creep. (you have noticed I don't care about which one of you is right or wrong, as you keep claiming I'm a 'drama referee') --- End quote --- I told him not to carry on an argument that Nickel is creepy because Iban had done worse and he would be called on it. You completely misunderstood it because you're handicapped, good job. --- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:50:15 PM ---Additionally, it is interesting that you can call all arguments petty and then claim that you've made non-petty arguments. Which is it? --- End quote --- The former, ref. All drama arguments are petty, but not all of them are wrong. |
| rkynick:
--- Quote from: Stocking on May 31, 2011, 10:54:14 PM ---I told him not to carry on an argument that Nickel is creepy because Iban had done worse and he would be called on it. You completely misunderstood it because you're handicapped, good job. --- End quote --- I understood it perfectly. It is, as I have said at least three times now, not correct to base anything on a "he's done worse" argument. I'll quote for you. --- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:50:15 PM ---I am bothering you about saying his argument lacks legitimacy because he is a creep.Which is it? --- End quote --- --- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:42:48 PM ---I explained why it was invalid; The example is meant to prove the point, you can't base the legitimacy of what someone says on what kind of person they are, and if that was your sole argument against the legitimacy of what he said, someone else with more legitimacy could easily repeat it verbatim and render your argument irrelevant. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:42:48 PM --- You can't say his opinion on whether or not someone is a creep is invalid because he himself is a creep. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 10:04:01 PM ---The creep has the right to call someone creepy. If you are that disturbed by it, I can reiterate what he said, and, try as you will to prove otherwise, I am not creepy. --- End quote --- I have tried as hard as I could to stay on topic. My topic has always obviously been this matter. Now of course you dismiss what I have said because I'm "handicapped", when you are the one who has misunderstood me... |
| Stocking:
--- Quote from: rkynick on May 31, 2011, 11:00:01 PM ---I understood it perfectly. It is, as I have said at least three times now, not correct to base anything on a "he's done worse" argument. I'll quote for you. I have tried as hard as I could to stay on topic. My topic has always obviously been this matter. Now of course you dismiss what I have said because I'm "handicapped", when you are the one who has misunderstood me... --- End quote --- http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=156068.msg3735388#msg3735388 Reread that about a hundred times until you understand it's relevancy. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |