Author Topic: Bisjac is destroying the forum? :(  (Read 22370 times)



I'm not claiming your argument is anything.

I'm saying that you said he was a creep himself and would get called out on it. I'm saying that that has no effect on his validity.

I'm saying

Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:50:15 PM
I am bothering you about saying his argument lacks legitimacy because he is a creep.
Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:42:48 PM
I explained why it was invalid; The example is meant to prove the point, you can't base the legitimacy of what someone says on what kind of person they are, and if that was your sole argument against the legitimacy of what he said, someone else with more legitimacy could easily repeat it verbatim and render your argument irrelevant.
Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:42:48 PM
You can't say his opinion on whether or not someone is a creep is invalid because he himself is a creep.
Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:04:01 PM
The creep has the right to call someone creepy.
If you are that disturbed by it, I can reiterate what he said, and, try as you will to prove otherwise, I am not creepy.


I'm saying that something isn't right with one of the things you said. Stop broadening the subject.

WAIT WHAT THE forget

He got you good lol

I'm saying that you said he was a creep himself and would get called out on it. I'm saying that that has no effect on his validity.

I'm not attacking his "validity", it was partly a warning for him to back off and partly calling him out on hypocrisy. I notice you completely disregard the fact that Iban's argument was calling Nickel creepy to attack his credibility as well, but you're okay with that because you're the kind of referee that always calls in favor of his favored side, or you're just a really bad referee. Probably both.

Now are we quite done?

He shouldn't be on the internet if he is afraid of seeing a picture of a girl in underwear leaning over

just napped. missed like 15 pages of wtf. here is my thoughts all in one;

- nick just forgeted up big time lol. i mean in a way we can all throw at him forever now.

- stocking appears out of nowhere, still apparently in a fear of bisjac. defending nick simply because hes his only supporter on the forum left; and there is nothing to lose lol.

- ronin makes 1 reply and no one is sure who it was to lol

- colten, chrono, rkynick and iban are being awesome

I'm going to give out my opinion.

ANYONE who likes Bisjac and what he does, I will hit you with a metal baseball bat in the testicles so hard you won't even know what happened.
come at-

lol one sec reading funny posts

come at me bro.
okay back and pretty well this

come at-

lol one sec reading funny posts
okay back and pretty well this
*whack*

wait, did i just whack you chrono? :(

everyone loves a bat to the balls ):D
these are my friends though.

One time while drunk I challenged my friends to a punch yourself in the nuts contest.

I won.

I'm not attacking his "validity", it was partly a warning for him to back off and partly calling him out on hypocrisy. I notice you completely disregard the fact that Iban's argument was calling Nickel creepy to attack his credibility as well, but you're okay with that because you're the kind of referee that always calls in favor of his favored side, or you're just a really bad referee. Probably both.

Now are we quite done?

How can you tell someone to back off and claim they are hypocritical without questioning their validity in the process?
My point is, then, that however hypocritical an argument is has no effect in a validity. I do not care that the creepiness is being used to attack validity as you will note my argument has been specifically your points about being hypocritical.

Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:42:48 PM
You can't say his opinion on whether or not someone is a creep is invalid because he himself is a creep.

For example.


Granted, however, I did claim
Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:50:15 PM
I am bothering you about saying his argument lacks legitimacy because he is a creep.

but in the context, that is saying his argument about creepiness lacks legitimacy because he is a creep, and thus it is still about hypocrisy.

I also said
Quote from: rkynick on Today at 08:42:48 PM
I explained why it was invalid; The example is meant to prove the point, you can't base the legitimacy of what someone says on what kind of person they are, and if that was your sole argument against the legitimacy of what he said, someone else with more legitimacy could easily repeat it verbatim and render your argument irrelevant.

and to that extent I suppose I could bother Iban about it as well, if it would make you feel any better.

In any case, I am not a referee. I have never claimed to be. I dislike an argument you used. I'm not sure where you get the feeling that I agree in any way with Iban, other than that I have ignored him. I haven't thought about it because I've been focused on you. I really don't care about it. What I have said to you may very well stand for the both of you, but I don't see him bothering to defend his methods, if they are so similar to yours.

Like I said, however, stop broadening the subject. This is about you.

Can I call Nick a creepy forgeter then instead of Iban? Because I've never done anything of the sorts.


*whack*

wait, did i just whack you chrono? :(
Yep.


To be honest I did feel creeped out by that, Nick. But it's fine if you didn't know I was. Also shouldn't have given Iban the chat log, god damn it.

I never saw anyone else post it, though.

I'll post it if you'd like.