Author Topic: My Little Pony: Friendship for Blockheads: General V2  (Read 8978187 times)

I recognized a lot of the art ;-;
That has got to be the worst logic I've ever seen.

stuntman and assbeef seem to do that a lot.
more stuntman than asa, since he believes making research automatically makes you a terrible artist, despite the quality.

quality > quantity > content

content should always be last when judging artwork from a personal perspective.

stuntman and assbeef seem to do that a lot.
more stuntman than asa, since he believes making research automatically makes you a terrible artist, despite the quality.

quality > quantity > content

content should always be last when judging artwork from a personal perspective.
because it does make you a terrible artist
quality is a part of art, yeah, but content is also a big part of it. would the mona lisa be as popular of a painting as it is today if she was topless and had stuffting richard nipples?

That has got to be the worst logic I've ever seen.
god damnit i need to be more obvious about my jokes

because it does make you a terrible artist
quality is a part of art, yeah, but content is also a big part of it. would the mona lisa be as popular of a painting as it is today if she was topless and had stuffting richard nipples?
content has little to no influence.
the statue of david depicts him bare ass naked yet he's standing tall in a public display art museum and being appreciated by billions from many countries.
there are paintings all around the world of naked angel children with snakees. my mother owned 5 of them and hung them proudly in her home. as did millions of other americans.
old Renascence artwork depicts many nude paintings, such as the painting of the naked man touching finger tips with God. he has a snake. all of this artwork is still appreciated today.
your logic is invalid.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2011, 02:23:38 PM by TheChaosCarrier »

god damnit i need to be more obvious about my jokes
it was a joke?
learn to be funny. >:C

content has little to no influence.
the statue of david depicts him bare ass naked yet he's standing tall in a public display art museum and being appreciated by billions from many countries.
there are paintings all around the world of naked angel children with snakees. my mother owned 5 of them and hung them proudly in her home. as did millions of other americans.
old Renascence artwork depicts many nude paintings, such as the painting of the naked man touching finger tips with God. he has a snake. all of this artwork is still appreciated today.
your logic is invalid.
artistic nudity =/= the kind of stuff john joseco draws
there's a BIG difference between a part of the human body and rainbow dash stuffting into applejack's mouth

it was a joke?
learn to be funny. >:C
it was a reference to something I said way back in 2008

artistic nudity =/= the kind of stuff john joseco draws
there's a BIG difference between a part of the human body and rainbow dash stuffting into applejack's mouth
Sorry sir. You are still incorrect.
What JJ draws is still artistic nudity. To think otherwise just makes you handicapped.
Now stop saying handicapped stuff to get an invalid point across because it isn't working.

rainbow dash stuffting into applejack's mouth
stuffting richard nipples?
I'm either talking to a brick wall or an immature 5 year old.
Take your pick, blockland forums.

I'm either talking to a brick wall or an immature 5 year old.
Take your pick, blockland forums.

Immature 5 year old brick wall

I don't see why JJ is such a big deal. Sure he's good at drawing and such but I've seen better.

Sorry sir. You are still incorrect.
What JJ draws is still artistic nudity. To think otherwise just makes you handicapped.
Now stop saying handicapped stuff to get an invalid point across because it isn't working.
I'm either talking to a brick wall or an immature 5 year old.
Take your pick, blockland forums.
please explain to me how ask princess molestia is artistic nudity

please explain to me how ask princess molestia is artistic nudity

oh god lol

please explain to me how ask princess molestia is artistic nudity
It isn't because there is no nudity whatsoever.
It's suggestiveness and that's it.

There's a difference between : artists making nude people for art and awes, and artists drawing naked stuff for loveual pleasure.

I find it hard to believe that JJ draws it for the art.