Blockland Forums > General Discussion

Why are people ID tribals?

Pages: << < (10/28) > >>

Messes:

My 830 obviously never gets discriminated, however my 24110 does a LOT. Then again, all I do is link them to proof such as RTB ID search and then they shut their yappers

but ID really does mean nothing other than you've been here longer. I've seen plenty of 20k's+ that build better than lower id's, act more mature, etc. etc.

Col. Burton:

I don't discriminate, I say that higher IDs have lower ages and usually lower intelligence levels.

blockhead55:

Once I figured out "blockhead" was considered "noobish" I changed it in game but not on the forums.  I was in a server and someone who must have bought the game 5 minutes ago was Banned instantly and the admins laughed.  Ther name was blockhead2800 something.  We where all noobs once.

Lake55:

I do not have the highest 'nor the lowest ID. (14128)

I fully agree with this post. Judging people by ID is foolish. Anybody in the community of Blockland who has ever judged someone by ID does not deserve their low ID, for they abuse this right. Everybody claims that a low ID is such a "Big deal." Get a life and stop discriminating people's IDs, morons.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.

...

Nexus:

I see a 29k or 30k id join my server
I instantly make expectations about what this person will do in the server and how I can expect to interact with them.
I see a 4 digit id join my server.
I make different expectations on what this person will do and how I plan on interacting with them.

Often during a conversation with someone, I will quickly open the player menu and look at their ID.  If I thought they were acting noobish, but then see that they have like a 1k id (happens too often), I will realize that the person is probably trolling, and deal with them differently than if I see they have a very high ID and know that they are new to the game.

I rarely make assumptions about IDs in the middle range.

Pages: << < (10/28) > >>

Go to full version