| Blockland Forums > General Discussion |
| The Blockland Bulletin [News Blog] |
| << < (24/87) > >> |
| Sheath:
--- Quote from: Tom on July 11, 2011, 03:00:06 AM ---Right now it see alike your idea of "research" is to find some gossip on IRC. --- End quote --- You don't actually understand the standards, nor research, TBB, its authors, and its articles put into practice. Since your logic is "image was off to what show I prefer, its all wrong" I think you are talking out of your depth right now. If you want to continue to have your say on what is published on TBB and suggest what needs to be changed, I suggest you change your attitude and rather than slag the blog over something trivial you decided to split straws about, make an actual complaint when you feel an article mis-represents a story. I won't be saying it again. Brony is not exclusive to Blockland or a specific series, as far as I have found. If you'd like to prove me wrong, I suggest you cite multiple sources to backup your continually serious claims unless you want to be dis-regarded as a reader. Do not belittle the efforts I and past authors put into developing a story, you have very little grasp on them. |
| stuntman021:
--- Quote from: Sheath on July 11, 2011, 03:04:52 AM ---You don't actually understand the standards, nor research, TBB, its authors, and its articles put into practice. Since your logic is "image was off to what show I prefer, its all wrong" I think you are talking out of your depth right now. If you want to continue to have your say on what is published on TBB and suggest what needs to be changed, I suggest you change your attitude and rather than slag the blog over something trivial you decided to split straws about, make an actual complaint when you feel an article mis-represents a story. I won't be saying it again. Brony is not exclusive to Blockland or a specific series, as far as I have found. If you'd like to prove me wrong, I suggest you cite multiple sources to backup your continually serious claims unless you want to be dis-regarded as a reader. Do not belittle the efforts I and past authors put into developing a story, you have very little grasp on them. --- End quote --- k http://www.equestriadaily.com/ http://www.ponychan.net/ http://www.wired.com/underwire/2011/06/bronies-my-little-ponys/ http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bronies notice the lack of old gen content on the first two and how it's all about the new friendship is magic series |
| Tom:
--- Quote from: Sheath on July 11, 2011, 03:04:52 AM ---You don't actually understand the standards, nor research, TBB, its authors, and its articles put into practice. Since your logic is "image was off to what show I prefer, its all wrong" I think you are talking out of your depth right now. If you want to continue to have your say on what is published on TBB and suggest what needs to be changed, I suggest you change your attitude and rather than slag the blog over something trivial you decided to split straws about, make an actual complaint when you feel an article mis-represents a story. --- End quote --- You need to cite where you get your I formation, especially if you are quoting a definition. The only thi I see cited is the IRC, so I can assume that was the only place you got your information. |
| Sheath:
--- Quote from: Tom on July 11, 2011, 03:12:22 AM ---You need to cite where you get your I formation, especially if you are quoting a definition. The only thi I see cited is the IRC, so I can assume that was the only place you got your information. --- End quote --- Published works do not require this, it is unprofessional to do so. This is not Wikipedia. --- Quote from: stuntman021 on July 11, 2011, 03:07:47 AM ---k http://www.equestriadaily.com/ http://www.ponychan.net/ http://www.wired.com/underwire/2011/06/bronies-my-little-ponys/ http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bronies notice the lack of old gen content on the first two and how it's all about the new friendship is magic series --- End quote --- Thank you for taking the time to prepare a proper complaint, which is actually helpful as opposed to Toms efforts which clearly have a hidden agenda. In response to this, the article has changed the image to the photo you supplied. It is important to note, the article is entirely factual however and it was not a problem with the research nor the written works of the article and the article in no way misinformed its readers. The image published was an oversight, and when written there was no understanding that the characters or artwork differed from series to series; such information was not necessary to look into when writing the article, only regular viewers of the show would be likely to understand the differences, and in this case it was trivial information that wasn't realized. It is important that in the future, complaints are approached in a proper manner. If you are aggressive, Tom, in your approach you will hinder progress to fix any issues. |
| Tom:
--- Quote from: Sheath on July 11, 2011, 03:17:22 AM ---Published works do not require this, it is unprofessional to do so. This is not Wikipedia. --- End quote --- http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=According+to&n=10&prev=0&frow=10&page=1 |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |