Off Topic > Games
Battlefield Megathread
Qwepir:
1942 is only good for it's nostalgia value.
I got it a while back after I had played BF2 and 2142 and the only part that interested me was the naval ships. Other than that it's just mediocre by today's standards. The following installments (sans bad company series) were better in almost every way. Quit living in the past.
Davy:
First BF I played was # 2.
RedGajin:
--- Quote from: Qwepir on October 12, 2011, 10:10:42 PM ---1942 is only good for it's nostalgia value.
I got it a while back after I had played BF2 and 2142 and the only part that interested me was the naval ships. Other than that it's just mediocre by today's standards. The following installments (sans bad company series) were better in almost every way. Quit living in the past.
--- End quote ---
I honestly find it a lot better then most of the battlefield series, the only other I thought were better were Bad Company 1 and 2. 2142 and all the other stuff battlefields sucked.
Qwepir:
--- Quote from: RedGajin on October 13, 2011, 12:19:36 AM ---the only other I thought were better were Bad Company 1 and 2
--- End quote ---
holy crap you are confirmed for no taste full handicap
brickybob:
--- Quote from: Davy on October 12, 2011, 10:56:17 PM ---First BF I played was # 2.
--- End quote ---
First BF I played was 1942.
awww yeaah