| Off Topic > Games |
| Battlefield Megathread |
| << < (1221/2003) > >> |
| A million souls:
Ameri - ican. Still want BF3... |
| hgpucom:
--- Quote from: Mushroom man on April 03, 2012, 06:33:27 PM ---No. harrier. F35. See the difference? --- End quote --- Harriers hover. F35s hover. Harriers have machine guns. F35s have machine guns. Harriers are flat-looking jets. F35s are flat- looking Jets. See the similarities? |
| Jubel:
--- Quote from: hgpucom on April 03, 2012, 10:17:16 PM --- Harriers hover. F35s hover. Harriers have machine guns. F35s have machine guns. Harriers are flat-looking jets. F35s are flat- looking Jets. See the similarities? --- End quote --- Except the F35 is slim and sleek, and the Harrier Jump Jet is a clusterforget of stupid looks. |
| hgpucom:
--- Quote from: Jubel on April 03, 2012, 10:31:05 PM ---Except the F35 is slim and sleek, and the Harrier Jump Jet is a clusterforget of stupid looks. --- End quote --- even as it seems, they both were meant to do the same job. |
| Qwepir:
--- Quote from: hgpucom on April 03, 2012, 10:17:16 PM --- Harriers hover. F35s hover. Harriers have machine guns. F35s have machine guns. Harriers are flat-looking jets. F35s are flat- looking Jets. See the similarities? --- End quote --- Not all F35s are capable of hovering. Neither plane carries machine guns. You don't know what "flat" means because neither of those planes are flat. --- Quote from: hgpucom on April 03, 2012, 10:41:11 PM --- even as it seems, they both were meant to do the same job. --- End quote --- The P38 Lightning of the second world war was a ground attack plane, are you implying that it is interchangeable with modern aircraft simply because it fulfilled a similar role? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |