Poll

battlefield 4

wowsers in my trousers
55 (37.9%)
bangarangzanga
17 (11.7%)
.
44 (30.3%)
awful
10 (6.9%)
wish it didnt exist
19 (13.1%)

Total Members Voted: 145

Author Topic: Battlefield Megathread  (Read 505677 times)

Crysis graphics with call of duty gameplay.
No thanks.

Crysis graphics with call of duty gameplay.
No thanks.
I'm going to ignore you because you're obviously trying to start a fight.

Tottaly getting this, can i preorder it already or?

I'm going to ignore you because you're obviously trying to start a fight.
Having opinions=/=Trying to start a fight

the only good thing i see about this game is the dinosaurs, finally some true innovation has come to games

Tottaly getting this, can i preorder it already or?
Yes.

Having opinions=/=Trying to start a fight
You're making empty opinions. You're looking at pictures and blindly throwing stuff out of your ass.

You're making empty opinions. You're looking at pictures and blindly throwing stuff out of your ass.

And youre looking at my opinion and blindly throwing assumptions out of your ass.
I've seen the e3 trailer, I've researched alot into the game, and it just looks like more generic fps bullstuff

And youre looking at my opinion and blindly throwing assumptions out of your ass.
I've seen the e3 trailer, I've researched alot into the game, and it just looks like more generic fps bullstuff
No point in arguing with you. You obviously haven't done the things you said if you say it's just another generic fps.

No point in arguing with you. You obviously haven't done the things you said if you say it's just another generic fps.
ironsights, blood on screen, regen health, exp system, instant kill knife
sure is generic fps in here

ironsights, blood on screen, regen health, exp system, instant kill knife
sure is generic fps in here
Don't forget the Super realistic brown and bloom effects

ironsights, blood on screen, regen health, exp system, instant kill knife
sure is generic fps in here
Don't forget the Super realistic brown and bloom effects
Engine: Frostbite 2

Release: October 25, 2011

Beta: September 2011

64 Player Multiplayer (PC)

24 Player Multiplayer (Console)

Full SinglePlayer Campaign

Co-Op Campaign

Air, Land and Sea Vehicles

USMC (SP & MP)

PLR (SP & MP*)

Russian Spetsnaz (SP* & MP)

Prone

Not compatible with DX9

Fight in the US, Midle East and Europe

Collector`s Edition*

Massive Destruction

Mount your weapon to most terrain

Back to Karkand Expansion (details at BF3 homepage)

Upgraded weapon & FOV system

Deeper bullet drop system than BC2

Drag wounded soldiers in SP only

Better optimized for x64

More unlocks/content than BC2

Assault, Recon, Support, Engineer

Battle Recorder*

Character Customization

Kill Cam*

No mod tools on release

Dedicated Servers

Selective Fire

Blood Effects

Selectable Grenades

Suppression Effect

Conquest Returns

Health Bar

Squad Leader

4-man Squads

Equipable & Quick Knife

Sniper Scope Sway

Customizable DogTags


~Weapons~


M4

M16-A4

AK-74M

AKS-47u

P90

M-240

M-249

PKM*

Pecheneg

G3

Mp5*

DAO-12

TYPE-88

MK11

SVD

RPG-7

AT-4

SMAW

M9

MP443

SIG226*

AS VAL

MP-60


~Vehicles~


LAV-25

Humvee

AAVP7A1

UH-1Y*

SU-37/SU-34*

F/A-18 Super Hornet

MH-6 Little Bird

AH-1Z

A-10 Thunderbolt II

M1A1 Abrams


Look through that whole entire list and point out the unique aspects.

Massive Destruction

Mount your weapon to most terrain


Health Bar

Customizable DogTags
 
The destruction is going to be massively hyped and end up being bullstuff.
Mounting most weapons would be useless.

see all those weapons? they could easily be cut down to about 5 and nothing would be changed at all. all the assault rifles are the same, all the smgs are the same, all the shotguns are the same, etc.
and all the "new features" are the same goddamn things that all the other ~*realistic*~ brown cover shooters have. quake 3 has 32 player multiplayer, no co op, no vehicles, only 10 weapons and it still kicks a metric ton of ass more than your stuffty battlefield. all the weapons are different from each other and serve different purposes. you know the best part? you can hold them all at once. you don't loving need to only carry 2 weapons, you pick up weapons from when you start. you don't need bullet dropoff because that punishes a player for shooting accurately.

64 player multiplayer, 64-bit support and 4-man squads are what really push this away from CoD or "generic fps".  You're just butthurt that there are people getting excited over a new FPS.

see all those weapons? they could easily be cut down to about 5 and nothing would be changed at all. all the assault rifles are the same, all the smgs are the same, all the shotguns are the same, etc.
and all the "new features" are the same goddamn things that all the other ~*realistic*~ brown cover shooters have. quake 3 has 32 player multiplayer, no co op, no vehicles, only 10 weapons and it still kicks a metric ton of ass more than your stuffty battlefield. all the weapons are different from each other and serve different purposes. you know the best part? you can hold them all at once. you don't loving need to only carry 2 weapons, you pick up weapons from when you start. you don't need bullet dropoff because that punishes a player for shooting accurately.
>claim all weapons are the same
>never played any "generic" shooters

>claim quake 3 is better
>MY OPINION IS BETTER THAN YOUR OPINION

you butthurt bro?