Author Topic: "There she is" got me again.  (Read 3899 times)

in the chance that anyone watching this decides to embrace the moral, take in mind that this moral also applies to this whole brony argument on the forums.







then again, nobody adopts morals from the internet.
no please don't bring it up

in the chance that anyone watching this decides to embrace the moral, take in mind that this moral also applies to this whole brony argument on the forums.







then again, nobody adopts morals from the internet.
And
here
we
go.

What the forget is that sad it's not sad it's like an episode of Looney Toons.

Love this small series.

It should be more symbolically accurate, maybe turn the girl into female combine soldier.
I'll try, unfortunately, i deleted the save thinking i'd never go back to that...

What the forget is that sad it's not sad it's like an episode of Looney Toons.
You've seen all of the steps?



no please don't bring it up
It's an equally valid comparison.

denying it's validity is a perfect setup for being called a hypocrite lol.

THEN AGAIN YOU NEVER SAID YOU AGREED WITH THE MORAL...


This series touched me in a weird way.

I just watched the rest. I nearly cried.

I watched this twice and I want to watch it again.



You can still put your mouse in the bottom left corner to see subtitles.
What subtitles? The audio is just very suiting music. There is no subtitles for the feelings you're supposed to have. Human nature isn't that simple.



in the chance that anyone watching this decides to embrace the moral, take in mind that this moral also applies to this whole brony argument on the forums.







then again, nobody adopts morals from the internet.
Except the bunny did not choose to be a bunny, legitimately fell in love with a cat, and actually got injured for it. The "no"-people even went out of their way to make the "yes"-people miserable, while those being targeted by the "no"-people didn't do anything wrong.

Do I have to bring up the real problem with 'bronies' again? I shouldn't have to. It would mean you're going to ignore it again anyways.

Instead, we can go back on topic instead of stirring up stuff again.

I remember seeing this a long time ago, I'm glad someone brought it up


With out the whole Luvvy Duvvy part, It reminds me back in the days when Whites couldn't be with blacks.

I really liked that.