Blockland Forums > General Discussion

(video) Gentoo discusses Blockland

Pages: << < (5/6) > >>

Dillpickle:


--- Quote from: SirLancelot7 on August 20, 2011, 07:14:18 PM ---When he is talking about Family RPs, he is saying that any type of RP is a family RP.  He referred to my post-apocalyptic RP and said that it was a post-apocalyptic family RP.  It had no families in it whatsoever.

--- End quote ---
How do you know he was referring exactly to you?

DrenDran:


--- Quote from: SirLancelot7 on August 20, 2011, 07:14:18 PM ---When he is talking about Family RPs, he is saying that any type of RP is a family RP.  He referred to my post-apocalyptic RP and said that it was a post-apocalyptic family RP.  It had no families in it whatsoever.

--- End quote ---
I think he's trying to be a smartass by saying that since everyone is technically part of a family (they had to be born by someone) and that that means that everything that is done is done by a member of a family, everything is a family activity, and thus a roleplaying server of it, is a family rp.


Supreme Guy:


--- Quote from: DrenDran on August 20, 2011, 08:55:12 PM ---I think he's trying to be a smartass by saying that since everyone is technically part of a family (they had to be born by someone) and that that means that everything that is done is done by a member of a family, everything is a family activity, and thus a roleplaying server of it, is a family rp.


--- End quote ---
That or he saw a server titled "apocolypse family rp" and not sirlancelot's Apocolypse RP.
:/

Fruit:


--- Quote from: Supreme Guy on August 20, 2011, 09:17:08 PM ---That or he saw a server titled "apocolypse family rp" and not sirlancelot's Apocolypse RP.
:/

--- End quote ---

I wasn't directing it to anyone in general, and yes, I did see a "Post-Apocalyptic RP" on the server list. Although, it was technically an example.

Fruit:

Also, regarding this, this conversation is prone to have misconcepted "rants" about what I think, because I wasn't planning on even having this conversation being public. Supreme had recorded it. I had a bit of doubt at the time he had said so, but I still had not bothered to revoke him, since I didn't see much of an issue with this.

So, I appologize for any misleading, irrational, or misconcepted subjects in this conversation.

Pages: << < (5/6) > >>

Go to full version