Off Topic > Games
The Elder Scrolls Megathread
.Atlas:
--- Quote from: MegaScientifical on January 19, 2013, 08:18:41 PM ---Those must be post-processed, because I doubt playing in that is as fun as looking at stills of it.
--- End quote ---
30 fps ingame. Up to 60 in dungeons. Bleak ENB.
MegaScientifical:
I'm not talking about processing, I'm talking about how hard it must be to play when everything is one of 20 shades of bleached peach.
.Atlas:
--- Quote from: MegaScientifical on January 20, 2013, 01:22:07 AM ---I'm not talking about processing, I'm talking about how hard it must be to play when everything is one of 20 shades of bleached peach.
--- End quote ---
Easy really. If I get tired of the colors, I switch it to Bight instead of Bleak. Same creator, easy to swap.
Littledude:
--- Quote from: otto-san on January 19, 2013, 10:57:45 PM ---it really is a matter of what you consider good graphically
i personally enjoy it when the graphics manage to look as close to as they would in reality as possible (bumpmaps, reflections, water improvements, etc.) to an extent i previously believed not reachable easily
the issue with this of course is that the initial "WWWWAOW" can distract too much from the actual game, and once it wears off, it's like "ehh. w/e. how can it be even better"
honestly though, vanilla skyrim is pretty good-looking. not the paradigm of graphics in games, but it's pretty gosh darn good.
--- End quote ---
yeah, I prefer graphics to just look good within the realm of the game. If everything in the game is all blocky and low res(as long as everything doesn't look like poop) than it looks fine to me.
Games set within our universe and timeline should look as realistic as possible. But Skyrim can look however it wants because it'll look like Skyrim and fit within its own realm regardless of whether it is realistic or not.
Jairo:
elder scrolls online cinematic trailer looks fantastic
too bad it showed 0 gameplay