Off Topic > Games

The Elder Scrolls Megathread

Pages: << < (1761/2222) > >>

Man 2:


--- Quote from: Eksi on July 16, 2012, 11:10:33 PM ---I suppose there's reasons to fight for or against both sides. I will surely have to make an imperial-sympathizing character (though I'm sure I would have regardless). I fear I will not be getting into my New Vegas DLCs for some time..

--- End quote ---
The means and ends of both the Empire and the Stormcloaks are honorable. Except perhaps that the Empire's means are a tad cowardly.
The Thalmor are just bad. Buttheads, all of them.

--- Quote from: Treynolds416 on July 16, 2012, 11:12:55 PM ---Who the forget cares, you'd be dumb to have a non-altmer mage
I mean lol, why wouldn't you

--- End quote ---
I tried rolling an Altmer mage, I got my ass kicked. Bretons are much better for their magic resistance.

Treynolds416:


--- Quote from: Man 2 on July 16, 2012, 11:15:12 PM ---I tried rolling an Altmer mage, I got my ass kicked. Bretons are much better for their magic resistance.

--- End quote ---
You get hit by magic regardless of what you're playing as, so that's of very little consequence. Just because you're unable to defend your weak little mage doesn't mean breton is a better choice

Man 2:


--- Quote from: Treynolds416 on July 16, 2012, 11:18:38 PM ---You get hit by magic regardless of what you're playing as, so that's of very little consequence. Just because you're unable to defend your weak little mage doesn't mean breton is a better choice

--- End quote ---
Well it's the best choice for me because I suck at mage characters.
I suck at all characters, really. It's just a matter of difficulty level.

Jairo:

"have you seen those warriors from hammerfell? they've got curved swords. curved. swords."
~every guard in the game

"come to dragonshreach to dishcuss the angoing hoshtilities, like the other great warriorsh?"
~farengar secret-lisp

some of my favourite quotes

steve5451:

Lately I've been letting my friend play Skyrim on my PC.


This horse is legendary.

Pages: << < (1761/2222) > >>

Go to full version