The only thing that might have some repercussions is the creeper cameo. Everything else is too distorted to prove anything.
My Little Pony might also be problematic.
The only real good show on Cartoon Network is Star Wars: The Clone Wars.
The only thing that could be called good about it on any level is the perverted thought that the model for Padme has a nice ass, and in one episode, the Clone barricades had a pinup poster.
>Implying Adventure Time is handicapped
GET
OUT
He wasn't implying, he was saying directly.
On that page:
-snip-
I see what you did there, with our old emote.
I heard that the new Loony Tunes cartoons are alright. :I
Honestly, the rest there appeals to children who had too much sugar.
It's no longer Looney Toons. I think it's stuff rebranding. They try to piggyback dying popularity of the Looney Toons brand to push a show very unlike anything they've done. Maybe you could say it's a good show for how it is, but branding it with Looney Toons makes no sense. (What REALLY loving bothers me is Lola was supposed to be Bug's better, awesome and all. I remember watching Space Jam and you'd always think "Wow, she kicks ass. Bugs loves her." They literally inversed her into a clumsy, annoying fool. How did they get away this that stuff?)
Regular show is good.
Adventure time is alright.
I like how they never fully go the expected direction in the most obvious themes... It's sort of like how I'd get tired of the same idea in every show, and wish they'd change it up. They do.
>cartoon network tries to appeal to things kids like on the internet
>everybody yells at them for selling out culture that isn't even funny
Because you can not use them in a TV show passively. It's corny. It's people consciously deciding to add it for the explicit purpose of viewership, which defeats the fun in what they are trying to use.
