| Off Topic > Games |
| Pokémon VG Megathread |
| << < (821/2242) > >> |
| Truce:
--- Quote from: BlockoCrafter on September 25, 2013, 05:04:19 PM ---So a triple redundancy is better than a double redundancy? Seriously where are you going with this? You're probably just being a Gen 1 elitist. --- End quote --- Please tell me you're trolling and you're not this stupid. It was a joke that they just copy pasted the Pokemon twice instead of three times, since three times was too much effort. Relax buddy. EDIT: Just saw you called the new evolution Duoblade when the picture says Doublade - not sure which is incorrect. |
| BlockoCrafter:
--- Quote from: Truce on September 25, 2013, 05:07:24 PM ---EDIT: Just saw you called the new evolution Duoblade when the picture says Doublade - not sure which is incorrect. --- End quote --- Probably the official image. |
| KoopaScooper:
--- Quote from: Truce on September 25, 2013, 05:07:24 PM ---EDIT: Just saw you called the new evolution Duoblade when the picture says Doublade - not sure which is incorrect. --- End quote --- Pretty sure the origin comes from "double blade." I may be completely wrong, however. |
| childofdarkness016:
--- Quote from: KoopaScooper on September 25, 2013, 09:09:09 PM ---Pretty sure the origin comes from "double blade." I may be completely wrong, however. --- End quote --- I'm pretty sure it comes from "Da Blade," meaning it should be "Doublade." (Of course, I jest. But I doubt the official Pokémon website would make such a heinous error) |
| Regulith:
--- Quote from: Truce on September 25, 2013, 05:07:24 PM ---EDIT: Just saw you called the new evolution Duoblade when the picture says Doublade - not sure which is incorrect. --- End quote --- It's Doublade, I kept reading it as "Duoblade" Probably because it sounds better |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |