Stocking - No explanation needed.

Off Topic > Drama

<< < (127/147) > >>

Siren:
personally i think its right to be mad if you can get arrested because someone posted something on a internet legos forum

Aphtonites:

--- Quote from: Qwepir on January 02, 2012, 09:41:29 PM ---itt: brutally buttmad brit tries to push his imperialist agenda

--- End quote ---
All i was talking about how Stocking could get actual people in legal trouble, not the country itself.

--- Quote from: Stocking on January 02, 2012, 09:41:06 PM ---They aren't nude though.

And what kind of sick, twisted country would outlaw lolicon?

The UKraine

--- End quote ---
It's far too obvious that you're trolling here.
I remember someone called Vertzer on the forum sometime in late 2007, he was openly discussing child research and got banned in a huge drama.
And you? you actually posted the sick material, which is even worse, i don't know why moderation here has degraded so loving much.

Stocking:

--- Quote from: Aphtonites on January 02, 2012, 09:47:07 PM ---I remember someone called Vertzer on the forum sometime in late 2007, he was openly discussing child research and got banned in a huge drama.
And you? you actually posted the sick material, which is even worse, i don't know why moderation here has degraded so loving much.

--- End quote ---

The reason child research is illegal is because it's evidence of child abuse, and anyone owning material like that should be rightly prosecuted.

Loli/Shota are just illustrated works of art, nobody's hurt by it. The only reason it's illegal in your country is because your queen is too inbred to know the difference.

Proog:
There wasn't any nudity in them.
If those were bannable, Hot Girls wouldn't even be here.

SpreadsPlague:
loli and molesting children is encouraged in america anyway. one word - christianity. priests are homoloveual recruitment tools. if you go to church you will be loveually assaulted. it's in the bible. jesus loves you.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version