Author Topic: Smoking weed is better than not smoking  (Read 3823 times)


We eat stuffty food, drink alcohol, and smoke tar. Explain why we shouldn't be allowed to smoke/eat weed? If your argument is "people will die" or "it's bad for you" you're probably either a hypocrit or a pusillanimous individual.
Because.


Salvia + Weed = Wild ride


If it does somehow get legalized, businesses will have to be careful in regulation of their employees, considering the effects of weed tend to stay around for a while, and is somewhat similar to alcohol in it's effects. Also, weed should be prohibited from any place that bans alcohol or tobacco smoking.

Still, a good amount of people in the population will depend on it, and develop a psychological addiction to it, if not physical.
The effects of pot can last up to 4 hours depending on quality. Traces of the drug remain in your body for up to 48 hours only in moderate smokers

Canada government is slowly pushing towards legalizing weed.
Just on the news :/
The problem is with that is if you sell cannabis (like me) it would be to easy to just go to a government store and buy some then going through the hassle of dealers, plus people who grow it will be out alot of money and the production of the underground will slow down alot.
Thus more and more people will be pushed towards selling harder drugs like coke and other.

Lol, I'm high (legal prescription dawg) and I gotta say it is worth it. I am no longer a cynical douche, rather, I can easily play this game can enjoy every single minute of it. 
 :cookieMonster: :cookie:

go to bed


You don't want to flaunt that you sell stuff like that.

Canada government is slowly pushing towards legalizing weed.
Just on the news :/
The problem is with that is if you sell cannabis (like me) it would be to easy to just go to a government store and buy some then going through the hassle of dealers, plus people who grow it will be out alot of money and the production of the underground will slow down alot.
Thus more and more people will be pushed towards selling harder drugs like coke and other.

Yes but growers make deals with clinics and such to sell to them

Yes but growers make deals with clinics and such to sell to them
Yeah this stuff makes no sense, you can grow weed illegally and then sell it to spots to sell it legally.

loving legal systems how do they work?

You don't want to flaunt that you sell stuff like that.
Its a forum about lego.
The government isint going to take the time to monitor stuff like that.
Edit: It would also be such a small bust theres literaly no use. It would cost the government more to find and track.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2012, 01:48:28 AM by Kilser »

Tell me where I was wrong

People will develop a psychological dependence to nearly anything. It just so happens that weed also gives feelings of pleasure so it will be a candidate for addiction by certain individuals.

Psychological addiction: Individual depends on it, not necessarily a physical addiction but it can be

Physical addiction: The body craves it strongly, might go into withdrawal without it (Example: Nicotine in cigarettes)

I never said weed must be physically addictive, as a lot of smokers of it tend to claim that it is not physically addictive.


Quote
If it does somehow get legalized, businesses will have to be careful in regulation of their employees, considering the effects of weed tend to stay around for a while, and is somewhat similar to alcohol in it's effects. Also, weed should be prohibited from any place that bans alcohol or tobacco smoking.

Still, a good amount of people in the population will depend on it, and develop a psychological addiction to it, if not physical.

1. The effects of weed aren't at all similar to the effects of alcohol. You coordination is still there, along with everything else. So performance at work shouldn't be affected. The reasons for alcohol and tobacco being banned at places is because they cause harm to others. For instance, Second-hand smoking from cigarettes, and people who can't handle their alcohol(Being violent, a nuisance, etc). There's nothing damaging from being around pot, and the user will never react in a harmful or irritating way, so why ban it?

2. While it can be a habit, the psychological addiction is nothing. People will always find it attractive because they find it comfortable. For comparison, think of that being at home feeling. It's strange to be away from it after you've been there for so long, but you learn to live without it. Same goes for weed, the "addiction" isn't harmful, and you don't depend on it. You're not thinking "How am I going to through this situation without being high", you're thinking "Imagine how awesome this situation would be if I was high".

i live in the bay area, and everyone smokes a joint whenever they can.

I live in bay area too, and it's crazy how much 10 years olds are caught by teachers at school.

I really wonder if the DARE programs have changed their tune whatsoever about Pot since I was in gradeschool.

I remember they pretty much painted it to be the devil in the form of a plant.