Poll

Are you in favor of revoking ID 3639? (Please take time to read the thread and all links before voting)

Yes
No

Author Topic: Petition to revoke key of ID 3639 or more formally known as, "%1"  (Read 11387 times)

%1 makes the game fun. He's someone you love to hate! He's an anarchistic antihero!
"I propose all murderers are freed from jail because without murderers, nobody will know they exist and GTA IV wouldn't make any sense."

You don't disagree with something just because you don't like the person who wrote it.

Yes you can. From his viewpoint, the op is a douche who gets all whiny when he doesn't get his way.

WHy hasnt he been banned yet?He knows console commands to lag servers.

Yes you can. From his viewpoint, the op is a douche who gets all whiny when he doesn't get his way.
God you're stupid.

That's ad hominem.

Don't try and use your knowledge of logical fallacies for an argument if you have absolutely no clue what they mean.

Oh look who else doesn't want this to happen.

Boltster.

It doesn't surprise me that two users who have a reputation here do not support having this user's key deactivated. It seems like it's out of fear that you would be punished for the kind of stuff you do online.

I'm not even saying this to demonize you or win an argument. I genuinely think the only reason you don't support having %1's key deactivated is because you act like a douchebag online and don't want to be held accountable for it.

That or you're only disagreeing with the thread because I made it. In which case you should probably never vote on anything.
I'm not afraid of being held accountable for anything. I just think it's hillarious that you and whoever else always seem to opt for the "cry like little girls and remove the person" option rather than the "not cry like girls and remove their access from the server". I have the same opinion here as I did with your last "waah he should be banned" thread - except instead of just ignoring them, ban them. Problem solved.

I'm not afraid of being held accountable for anything. I just think it's hillarious that you and whoever else always seem to opt for the "cry like little girls and remove the person" option rather than the "not cry like girls and remove their access from the server". I have the same opinion here as I did with your last "waah he should be banned" thread - except instead of just ignoring them, ban them. Problem solved.
alright whatever.

from now on I'll just consider an insult from you as an insult and nothing deeper.

God you're stupid.

That's ad hominem.

Don't try and use your knowledge of logical fallacies for an argument if you have absolutely no clue what they mean.


From HIS viewpoint. Calling you stupid anyways has nothing to do with ad hominem.

Read up.

alright whatever.

from now on I'll just consider an insult from you as an insult and nothing deeper.
Whatever you say, detective seventh!

From HIS viewpoint. Calling you stupid anyways has nothing to do with ad hominem.

Read up.

noedit: Also, what you said WAS ad hominem.

Basically, you were saying "His argument shouldn't be credible due to him not liking me!"

From HIS viewpoint. Calling you stupid anyways has nothing to do with ad hominem.

Read up.
Calling me stupid has nothing to do with ad hominem when the insult is made in no way directed at my argument.

The example you offered me, was different from Boltster in that you're saying that you can disagree with my thread because I'm, "A whiny bitch".

The situation is resolved. I originally thought boltster was actually implying something through his insult, but I thought wrong.

Whatever you say, detective seventh!
You have a habit of reusing my arguments in attempt to make me look stupid. There's nothing wrong with that, but you keep doing it wrong.

"from now on I'll just consider an insult from you as an insult and nothing deeper" has nothing to do with sticking your head in the sand or making yourself ignorant out of fear. You're grasping at straws.

noedit: Also, what you said WAS ad hominem.

Basically, you were saying "His argument shouldn't be credible due to him not liking me!"
I never said that.

It's like talking to an inanimate object!


You have a habit of reusing my arguments in attempt to make me look stupid. There's nothing wrong with that, but you keep doing it wrong.

"from now on I'll just consider an insult from you as an insult and nothing deeper" has nothing to do with sticking your head in the sand or making yourself ignorant out of fear. You're grasping at straws.
Trust me, you need absolutely no help looking stupid. You're well off your training wheels when it comes to that.

And yeah maybe you didn't mean it as a dismissive head in the sand thing, but that's the way it read so i'm running with it. It'll eventually be valid anyway considering that's exactly what you always do when you can't handle being wrong and looking like a twat

also i thought of a caption for that picture that made me giggle "Detective seventh on his next grand clue finding adventure!"

what are you implying?
duurppppppppppppppppppppppp

Trust me, you need absolutely no help looking stupid. You're well off your training wheels when it comes to that.

And yeah maybe you didn't mean it as a dismissive head in the sand thing, but that's the way it read so i'm running with it. It'll eventually be valid anyway considering that's exactly what you always do when you can't handle being wrong and looking like a twat

also i thought of a caption for that picture that made me giggle "Detective seventh on his next grand clue finding adventure!"
It's like I'm reading a counterargument from one of my female classmates on facebook.

rather than just admit you're wrong, you stick to your, "I argue whether people want to agree with me or not" ideology and sandwich it between petty insults that are completely irrelevant to the situation at hand.

I hope when you're a parent you have to deal with your kids going through this rebellious stage of adolescence where they will bug the forget out of you.

damn son, seventh is ignorant