Mass Effect Thread. ALL ME3 DLC LEAKED READ PAGE 30

Off Topic > Games

<< < (88/92) > >>

CreamTurk3y:
Bump

Child: Tell me another story of the Shepard.
Stargazer: Did you buy the DLC?
Child: No
Stargazer: Go to bed.

Acid:
The new endings do a really good job of explaining everything. One of my biggest qualms with the original ending was how Shepard didn't question the catalyst at all. In the extended endings he asks exactly what we're all thinking (Mainly who made him and wtf is going on).

While I still chose destroy ending just in case Indoc. theory is true I think it was actually a really decent choice anyway.

Part of me feels like they just made the endings... happier. That is what the majority of people wanted. I don't think people could cope with the series ending so harshly in the original endings. Bioware did sort of give in and change the endings slightly so everyone was less... devastated after the explosions.

One thing that still freaks me out is that the black, wobbly trees and shrubs from your dreams appear in the ending before you go up the beam. That still freaks me out and means that there's a small chance that it's a dream sequence still. I was hoping Bioware would make it clear whether the ending is definitely real or a dream but they left that small detail in and I'm not going to forget about it.

Also, wtf destroy ending STILL has Shepard waking up in a pile of stone rubble like in the original. Seriously Bioware what are you trying to tell us. It's like they're trying to further explain the logic behind the actual endings, they try to reinforce why it's real and then they just add these little things to mess your view on it up. If they had removed the hallucination trees and removed the scene of Shepard somehow SURVIVING the destroy ending (Literally impossible if what the Catalyst says is true) then I would be completely fine with believing the ending but I just can't help but still think that Indoctrination Theory (Or something similair to it, just a dream sequence of sorts) is the true ending to this series. But that's impossible right because they aren't making anymore games... Right?

Sabbin:
There's a hidden refusal ending if you shoot the catalyst instead of walking to one of the other choices in the extended cut. And he replies with "So be it" in Harbinger's voice. Way to disprove the indoc. theory and then give MORE reasons to believe it.

Pengie:
Okay, this wasn't too horrible. I did put the extended cut off for a while, I was so afraid of disappointment (even though I didn't have any expectations, it was just a nagging feeling).

I'm mostly okay with this, but I agree with this:

--- Quote from: Acid on June 28, 2012, 10:44:55 PM ---Also, wtf destroy ending STILL has Shepard waking up in a pile of stone rubble like in the original. Seriously Bioware what are you trying to tell us. It's like they're trying to further explain the logic behind the actual endings, they try to reinforce why it's real and then they just add these little things to mess your view on it up. If they had removed the hallucination trees and removed the scene of Shepard somehow SURVIVING the destroy ending (Literally impossible if what the Catalyst says is true) then I would be completely fine with believing the ending but I just can't help but still think that Indoctrination Theory (Or something similair to it, just a dream sequence of sorts) is the true ending to this series. But that's impossible right because they aren't making anymore games... Right?

--- End quote ---

I agree with completely.

Along with this, I also hate how in the destroy ending where Shepard's name is not put on the memorial obviously leaves it open for interpretation. Many things leave the endings open for interpretation.

Open. For interpretation. What the forget? Okay, now I'm fed up of being lied to, this was supposed to be closure. "Provide closure" Exact words. Anyone else iritated by this?

Sabbin:
Bioware can't spell Closure.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version