Off Topic > Games
Shooter games are just not engaging
TheScout:
I would recommend BF3, but that stuff isn't
Frostbyte:
Bioshock Infinite doesn't seem to have boring gameplay.
I mean how could it be boring if your flinging on rails, attacking zeppelins, fighting giant spiffy robots, and using goddam crows at the top of the sky?
Far Cry series is also pretty good aswell, it forces you to think alot before you attack and to survive on your own. I'd say check out the 2nd one but the 3rd one looks very well done.
Lord Tony³:
People don't want a story, they just want to shoot. Which is why DOOM, Duke Nukem3d and Wolfenstein 3D worked so well.
Doom3 sucked ass with that stuffty lighting gimmick. Duke Nukem Forever still isn't the same classic Duke Nukem 3d and Wolfenstein 2012 is a piece of stuff.
I'll take my shooter with absolutely no story over the shooter with a story.
Lord Tony³:
--- Quote from: Bisjac on April 10, 2012, 10:28:24 PM ---half life 3 might save us ; ;
i hope with half life 3, they make a effort to have half the game as multiplayer. rather then all campaign.
no hl2 deathmatch wasnt good enough. it was simply a tool for modding and private servers. not real valve gameplay.
--- End quote ---
I believe Half-Life 2 started the lame shooter genre. Enemy AI misses on purpose, infinite ammo crates, 100+ explosive barrels just on one map, health literally thrown at you oh and my favorite checkpoints every 5 feet as if we are incapable of manually saving.
Frostbyte:
And. Here. We. Go.