Off Topic > Games
Fallout 4 - Where should it be set?
comr4de:
--- Quote from: tikitai on April 16, 2012, 12:11:04 AM ---and that is exactly what i mean
no offense to fallout 3, its a good game, but bethesda didnt noticed the gaping plot holes they created
--- End quote ---
not really
only about 5% of the nuclear arsenal of the world was ICBM based. If the US had as competent an interceptor force as the game claims, it's entirely possible that most of the bombs were eliminated en-route to the target.
plad101:
i think we need Missouri as the next Game but they need to add some working vehicle if you were to travel in it.
tails:
London would be amazing, But it's never going to leave the US.
Morpheus:
--- Quote from: Fracture on April 18, 2012, 11:25:25 PM ---I think they would only bomb majour areas. Nuclear weaponry isnt cheap, and if you really want to get the job done, nuke the places that matter, like New York, DC, Vegas, Florida, ect.
Colorado is way too good looking to be nuked, methinks.I havent seen a game set in Phoenix yet.
Game devs cant just make games set in... everywhere.
--- End quote ---
Tons of nukes are stored in the Rockies. Why not nuke the supply of nukes.
Max4344:
Seattle WA