Off Topic > Forum Games
YOU LAUGH YOU LOSE v666
Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph:
--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on November 08, 2016, 07:05:06 PM ---Apparently some news networks think that this is a more 'cinematic' way of taking an image.
That's like saying 24fps is a cinematic framerate, when in reality you're just too damn lazy to record more frames because it takes more work.
--- End quote ---
Armchair movie production expert reporting for duty.
No, the reason 24 fps is "cinematic" is because most film cameras shoot in 24 fps. A camera that can do 60fps while retaining the same picture quality is gonna be much more expensive. It has nothing to do with being "too damn lazy to record more frames".
There's also the issue of visual effects, specifically digital effects and digital animation. The more frames of animation there are, the more expensive its gonna be and the more time it's gonna take to draw/render/pose/etc. It's either way more expensive, or it's overall gonna look worse.
Daswiruch:
--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on November 08, 2016, 07:05:06 PM ---That's like saying 24fps is a cinematic framerate
--- End quote ---
24 fps IS a cinematic framerate because most movies are in this framerate
but cinematic doesn't necessarily mean good
Master Matthew²:
If my PC can render a fake world 60fps at 4k, Why cant a camera record the real world at 60fps 4k, for about the same price?
Daswiruch:
--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on November 08, 2016, 08:14:04 PM ---If my PC can render a fake world 60fps at 4k, Why cant a camera record the real world at 60fps 4k, for about the same price?
[im g]http://i.imgur.com/xnGbDts.gif[/img]
--- End quote ---
he just explained this
Nix the Glaceon: