Author Topic: do you believe the world will end this year?  (Read 3097 times)


Didn't they find that the Mayan Calendar was shorter than ours, and meant that technically on their calendar 2012 already passed?

If so, then no.

If not, then no.

Yes, of course. The great space weasel will eat us.

Didn't they find that the Mayan Calendar was shorter than ours, and meant that technically on their calendar 2012 already passed?

If so, then no.

If not, then no.
They accounted for leap years and cycles.

It was just dumb.



I believe that in an instant, a black hole will suck us up, then think we taste horrible and puke us out and it'll be like nothing happened. In other words, no.

If you didn't have a ghetto education, you would know this
The end of the world is based off of the Myan Calander
The calander didn't have leapyears
So it would've happend in like 2011
AND WE LIVED HAPPILY EVER AFTER
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 01:41:54 AM by D Trix »

I'm going to watch the movie "2012" the day after we're all supposed to die and I'll laugh.

Didn't they find that the Mayan Calendar was shorter than ours, and meant that technically on their calendar 2012 already passed?

If so, then no.

If not, then no.
But do you know WHY?

Fun fact: Julius Caesar didn't invent the leap year until much later than the mayan calendar existed. So the world should've ended last year if we're going by the time that the mayans laid out for us.

I'm going to watch the movie "2012" the day after we're all supposed to die and I'll laugh.

i planned on doing this too

But do you know WHY?

Fun fact: Julius Caesar didn't invent the leap year until much later than the mayan calendar existed. So the world should've ended last year if we're going by the time that the mayans laid out for us.

« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 01:41:16 AM by Tremrist »

"This long-count calendar isn't a calendar as much as a counting system. You know how we use a base-10 counting system? (10, 100, 1000, 10,000 etc.) The Mayans used a modifed base-20 counting system for keeping track of days - the second cycle went up to 18 rather than 20. So they tracked days in cycles of 20, 360, 7200, 144000, 2880000, etc.

We're coming to the end of one of the 144,000 day cycles. The concept of leap-years is irrelevant to this calendar system, because it's not based on solar years, simply on pure math. I've got no opinion of whether the calculated date of Dec 12, 2012 as the end of the cycle is accurate. But if it is inaccurate, it's for reasons that have nothing to do with leap years."
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 01:41:59 AM by Wynd_Fox »


Ogm guize we re all gonna dieeeeeee!!!!111